Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Tuesday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
Guys, here is a challenge for you...regarding hard disks
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anusha" data-source="post: 3175614" data-attributes="member: 828"><p>Bigger partition means more "average" seek times because it is not short stroking. But it's a data drive. I don't need performance. This is where Diskeeper comes in. It can organize the data on access patterns moving the frequently accessed files to the faster end of the partition. </p><p></p><p>I don't know how, but non-indexed searching in Vista is as fast as indexed searching in XP. There is no problem as to indexing, as I have indexed the files I search. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>Anyway the decision to have one partition in the 500GB one is else it would result in a data plan that I don't like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anusha, post: 3175614, member: 828"] Bigger partition means more "average" seek times because it is not short stroking. But it's a data drive. I don't need performance. This is where Diskeeper comes in. It can organize the data on access patterns moving the frequently accessed files to the faster end of the partition. I don't know how, but non-indexed searching in Vista is as fast as indexed searching in XP. There is no problem as to indexing, as I have indexed the files I search. :D Anyway the decision to have one partition in the 500GB one is else it would result in a data plan that I don't like. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom