
ywicky said:I'm using Vista!
As far as I know my MoBo is only compatible with Vista!
Clerk_Kent said:VIsta is much speeder than XP (if the hardware is as required)
btw i'm dual booting XP & vista...& i feel the differnce between very well..
Vista is speeder than XP in many ways...![]()
fallenzeraphine said:loooool now thats a sad story how can vista be speedier if it needs more hardware requirements than XP, My PC scores 5.7 on vista and is more than enough to run it with all the bells and whistles but even on my machine Vista is some times 50% slower than XP, almost all the games run slower on vista, and compression applications run slower, Vista may feel responsive but thats only the interface, all other important functions are drastically slower than XP, including file copying lool
that got to be true cause vista uses more memory than XP....that's what i said...

wrong buddy Windows 98 is utterly slower than XP, its multitasking was one of the worst in the industry, XP doenst use more than 90MB in standard installation, VIsta use 700MB on fist boot how abt that, vista is BLoated and slowClerk_Kent said:ha ha hathat got to be true cause vista uses more memory than XP....that's what i said...
btw windows 98 is so much faster than windows XP![]()
fallenzeraphine said:wrong buddy Windows 98 is utterly slower than XP, its multitasking was one of the worst in the industry, XP doenst use more than 90MB in standard installation, VIsta use 700MB on fist boot how abt that, vista is BLoated and slow

