Have you Turned to Vista ??

Have you Turned to Vista ??


  • Total voters
    75

rash87

Member
Apr 4, 2007
9,238
3
0
No, because the main software I use doesn't work in Vista:D

The other thing is that XP is just working fine to me;):D
 

dinuwije

Well-known member
  • Oct 18, 2006
    5,284
    648
    113
    42
    Moratuwa
    I'v been using Vista since march last year & its damn crappy.
    I cant install & run a lot of software & it taked too much ram to run & about 10 GB HD space.
    Sadly for me my Hard drive isn't partitioned.So i cnt format the thing & install XP.Otherwise I would have chucked Vista out of my comp after the first week itself

    So for hevens sake,dnt take vista & make the same mistake I did
     

    shelan

    Member
    Dec 19, 2007
    728
    5
    0
    apooo naha!!!!! vista dala ita passe xp damma!!!!!

    thawa tika kalak gihillama ayeth vista walata bahinawa!!!!!

    it absorbs more power when we use laptop in battery
     

    Clerk_Kent

    Well-known member
  • Jan 17, 2008
    25,206
    65
    48
    VIsta is much speeder than XP (if the hardware is as required)
    btw i'm dual booting XP & vista...& i feel the differnce between very well..
    Vista is speeder than XP in many ways...:D
     

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    Clerk_Kent said:
    VIsta is much speeder than XP (if the hardware is as required)
    btw i'm dual booting XP & vista...& i feel the differnce between very well..
    Vista is speeder than XP in many ways...:D

    loooool now thats a sad story how can vista be speedier if it needs more hardware requirements than XP, My PC scores 5.7 on vista and is more than enough to run it with all the bells and whistles but even on my machine Vista is some times 50% slower than XP, almost all the games run slower on vista, and compression applications run slower, Vista may feel responsive but thats only the interface, all other important functions are drastically slower than XP, including file copying lool
     

    Clerk_Kent

    Well-known member
  • Jan 17, 2008
    25,206
    65
    48
    fallenzeraphine said:
    loooool now thats a sad story how can vista be speedier if it needs more hardware requirements than XP, My PC scores 5.7 on vista and is more than enough to run it with all the bells and whistles but even on my machine Vista is some times 50% slower than XP, almost all the games run slower on vista, and compression applications run slower, Vista may feel responsive but thats only the interface, all other important functions are drastically slower than XP, including file copying lool

    ha ha ha:P that got to be true cause vista uses more memory than XP....that's what i said...

    btw windows 98 is so much faster than windows XP:P:P
     
    Last edited:

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    Clerk_Kent said:
    ha ha ha:P that got to be true cause vista uses more memory than XP....that's what i said...

    btw windows 98 is so much faster than windows XP:P:P
    wrong buddy Windows 98 is utterly slower than XP, its multitasking was one of the worst in the industry, XP doenst use more than 90MB in standard installation, VIsta use 700MB on fist boot how abt that, vista is BLoated and slow
     

    Clerk_Kent

    Well-known member
  • Jan 17, 2008
    25,206
    65
    48
    fallenzeraphine said:
    wrong buddy Windows 98 is utterly slower than XP, its multitasking was one of the worst in the industry, XP doenst use more than 90MB in standard installation, VIsta use 700MB on fist boot how abt that, vista is BLoated and slow

    Don't know about ur PC...but in mine...all the games load much faster than XP...
    And the performance is great & so is the applications:D
    DVD burns much faster in vista than XP...I can assure that cause I'm running a CD shop;)