No I'm giving up the idea....nuwa1 said:he he umbata oka gannakan iwasillak ne neda???
Anusha said:No I'm giving up the idea....
Just wondering what you people think....that's all.

why?? why r u giving it up???
I don't wanna answer to my own threadnuwa1 said:why?? why r u giving it up???
![]()

Anusha said:I don't wanna answer to my own thread![]()

Thread is asking for how usefull is quad core ne? i was asking why r u giving it up. he he so it means it's not useful.... OK buddy 
henderson said:well, currently in us market there are quad cores available for $200-$300 range and there are core 2 duo's available in $150-$300 range. Here I'm not talking about any extreme end processors like . The issue is how much these costs in SL? I think still quads are much higher priced than duo's (correct me if I'm wrong). So still in SL my opinion is going for core 2 duo is more beneficiary in SL.

Why are you spending so much money?tharinda07 said:im going to buy core2quad q9450 chip, dis august
I'm not asking just about the availability or price. I'm asking whether are you getting the benefits for the money you spent (and are spending on the electricity billhenderson said:well, currently in us market there are quad cores available for $200-$300 range and there are core 2 duo's available in $150-$300 range. Here I'm not talking about any extreme end processors like . The issue is how much these costs in SL? I think still quads are much higher priced than duo's (correct me if I'm wrong). So still in SL my opinion is going for core 2 duo is more beneficiary in SL.
)Figured it is not much useful...right now...nuwa1 said:Thread is asking for how usefull is quad core ne? i was asking why r u giving it up. he he so it means it's not useful.... OK buddy
no comments frm me. got to go..![]()
Anusha said:I'm not asking just about the availability or price. I'm asking whether are you getting the benefits for the money you spent (and are spending on the electricity bill)

that's what i am asking!henderson said:well bro, according to my point of view money is everything![]()
Anusha said:that's what i am asking!
on my Intel G33FB. Well to be quite honest for day to day use there is simply no difference. One thing the my CPU couldn't do was write 3 full capacity DVDs + run a installation of a game(Carbon,MW etc) in the same time, well, it could do but the Q6600 was smooth as water. Also the Q6600 boosted about 12-16 FPS on Crysis on a 8800GTS G92.why would anyone wanna burn 3 DVDs at once? :/chanster said:I am quite happy with my E2180 @ 2.66. It performs better than my friends E4600(Stock). As for the Quad, I compared a Q6600 and my E2180on my Intel G33FB. Well to be quite honest for day to day use there is simply no difference. One thing the my CPU couldn't do was write 3 full capacity DVDs + run a installation of a game(Carbon,MW etc) in the same time, well, it could do but the Q6600 was smooth as water. Also the Q6600 boosted about 12-16 FPS on Crysis on a 8800GTS G92.
Didnt want to try any 3D max, Premiere etc because obviously the Quad will win by a large margin(More cores,8x Cache)