Impeachment against the President.
The constitution provided that the impeachment may be brought against the president in the Parliament as per the Article 38(2) of the constitution.
As per the today’s judgement of the Supreme Court the dissolution of the parliament is null and void and against the constitution.
It is important to note that the after the dissolution many political parties and civil societies filed petitions against the act of the president under the Fundamental rights cases.
The president continuously rejected the opinions saying that the dissolution is against the constitution and he impliedly and expressly showing that he dissolved because of the certain political reasons and not the reason that he has been authorize by the constitution.
It is obvious that after the judgement of the cases against the dissolution the president has intentionally violated the constitution.
Accordingly under the Article 38(2)(a)(1) provided that the impeachment may be brought against the president with the reason that the intentional violation of the constitution.
Accordingly any members of the parliament may submit a notice of resolution in writing submit to the speaker as per the intentional. Isolation of the constitution.
Accordingly Article 38(2)(b) the said resolution shall be signed by 2/3 of the members of the parliament signed it is a duty of the speaker to accept it. Thought if is not less than 1/2 MPs signed the resolution it is up to the speaker to accept or reject.
According to the Article 38(2)(c) if the resolution is passed by the parliament with 2/3 the speaker shall refer to the Supreme Court for inquiry and report.
According to the Article 38(2)(d) at the Supreme Court the president shall appear him self or his lawyer for the due inquiry it shall be sent to speaker. If the Supreme Court found that the the allegation reason stated is correct the the parliament shall pass it again with 2/3 and remove the president as per the Article 38(2)(e) of the constitution.
After the dissolution notice issued by the president our country’s democracy, rule of law and good governance and the economy were in question.
Therefor the Parliament shall bring the impeachment against him and teach him a good lesson.
MIM Azver
LLB (Hons) LLM
Attorney at Law
13.12.2018
தமிழ் சுருக்கம்
சனாதிபதிக்கு எதிரான நம்பிக்கை இல்லா தீர்மானம்
அரசியல் அமைப்பின் பிரகாரம், அரசியல் அமைப்பை வேண்டுமென்று மீறிய காரணத்திற்காக நம்பாக்கியில்லா பிரேரணை கொண்டு அவர் முடியும். இன்றைய உயர் நீதிமன்ற தீர்ப்பு இதற்கு காரணமாகும்.
நம்பிக்கையில்லா பிரேரணை நிறைவேற்ற பாராளுமன்றத்தில் 2/3 பெரும்பான்மையும் உயர் நீதிமன்ற ஒப்புதலும் அவசியம். இதன்்பின்னர் மீண்டும் பாராளுமன்றத்தின் 2/3 பெரும்பான்மையுடன் நிறைவேற்றி சனாதிபதியை்பதவி்நீக்கம் செய்து அவரை சந்தோசமாக வீட்டுக்கு அனுப்ப முடியும்.
MIM Azver
LLB (Hons),LLM
Attorney at Law
13.12.2018
බුකියේ තිබුණේ
Last edited:
