Intel to Bring-In 3GHz Quad-Core Chips, 1600MHz Processor Bus.

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
Intel Accelerates 45nm Xeon Schedule, Plans Commercial Availability in 2007

The world’s largest chipmaker Intel Corp. announced on Wednesday that its server and workstation products made using 45nm process technology will be available already this year. Still, the company has a plenty of headroom with its 65nm chips and has plans to introduce 3.0GHz Intel Xeon “Clovertown” chips going forward.

Kirk Skaugen, the chief of Intel’s Xeon group, said during a conference call with analysts that the company plans to introduce low-power quad-core chip with 50W thermal design power in early March, to present code-named Caneland multi-processor server platform in Q3 2007 and to launch the first Xeon DP (dual processor) products made using 45nm process technology in the second half of the year.

The new Intel Xeon 45nm microprocessor for dual-socket applications based on the core that Intel calls Penryn will be drop-in compatible with the company’s contemporary Intel 5000-series core-logic sets (code-named Bensley and Glidewell platforms), however, there will be an improved version of the Intel 5000-series chipset aimed at HPC/WS market segments that features 1600MHz processor system bus (PSB) coming in the second half of the year to support higher-performance Xeon “Clovertown” chips with operation at 3GHz.

Quad-core microprocessor clocked at 3.0GHz should help Intel Corp. to compete against the quad-core products from Advanced Micro Devices, which are due to be out in mid-2007. Even though the code-named K8L chips from AMD are expected to offer higher performance than current Opteron products due to micro-architectural improvements, their clock-speeds are expected to be lower than today’s 2.80GHz. Currently Intel Xeon processors offer higher performance per clock compared to AMD Opteron in certain applications.

Intel’s next-generation microprocessors based on the micro-architecture known as Nehalem and its derivative Westmere will require a new platform, which will emerge in 2008. However, Intel remained silent concerning its next-generation micro-architecture during the call.

Source: Xbitlabs
 

chamithal

Member
Dec 12, 2006
5,616
1
0
Wow! Now some thing should be done regarding hard disks to keep up with this master blaster processors...
 

blood_brotha

Member
Sep 25, 2006
6,308
47
0
Nuuk, Greenland
quad core? now? it would be useless without the threading to support the quad cores. the same thing that's happned with AMD 64. quad core will be exclusively for work stations i think. i don't expect to see mainstream quad core for another couple of years. i bought a AMD 64 3200+ two years ago and i havent run any 64 bit software on it yet. and i want to sell that move on to core 2
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
blood_brotha said:
quad core? now? it would be useless without the threading to support the quad cores. the same thing that's happned with AMD 64. quad core will be exclusively for work stations i think. i don't expect to see mainstream quad core for another couple of years. i bought a AMD 64 3200+ two years ago and i havent run any 64 bit software on it yet. and i want to sell that move on to core 2
Most of the programs that come with Vista are multithreaded.

Quad Core is overkill for most people. Only the hardcore video encoders and video editors will benefit from it.

Don't buy an Operton. You are better off with Core 2 Duo.
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
blood_brotha said:
3 ghz quad core........ most programs of vista are multithreaded... i agree. but wont that kinda processing power be bottlenecked with the other hardware
Hehe. Normally (except the idiots in Sri Lanka), people don't buy a US$1000 CPU and 512MB DDR2-533 and 80GB Hard disks and use integrated graphics. :rolleyes:
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
chamithal said:
Yeah, mainly storage drives and bus...
I don't think the BUS affects the performance that much. The caching algorithms in these Core 2 CPUs are so complex and so much better than the old CPUs.