Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="rash87" data-source="post: 5193354" data-attributes="member: 25909">Wel let me define my self the culture for the answrs f ma slf um gonna brng out. Culture is not somethng which can b defined easily as what is a mobile phone o ne object for that matter.Basically culture is everythng, t can b a religon, t can b a fashion, a trend, a practice, t jus cud b nethng, bt culture dus hv certain qualities, like t's DYNAMIC, EVOLVING al the time n t z transmittable. Wel I dun thnk I hv brought out a clear definition for culture bt as I hv mentioned certain boundries of t, tho boundries of culture cud extend 2 infinity.Wel no, wethr d culture is poluted, wel yes no both. Bcuz 4 d simple fact dat term polluted z so relative. Pollution z simply can b termed as adding o mixing in resulting the quality of the original been changed. So in dat sense even adding sugar to a tea z also some kind f polluting. N in this instance, as I said earlier, culture iz something which is evolving n dynamic, is meant 2 b changed. So some may say that the culture is polluted bt some may say t z been updated which d latter I wud say z mo suitable. Nuthng in dis wrld meant 2 b go on 4ever without undergoing ne changs.Wel as d wrld chngs, as d wrld progresses, cuture in Sri Lanka believed 2 b prevailed way back, has deviated from t's origin point.N as wel as T has been some bad aspects,dere are gud aspects too.So I wud nt go wit d wrd tht d culture is polluted tho, d new direction t z running 2 might just b lung away frm wht t's used 2 b for a Sri Lankan,50 years back <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />I think I hv sufficiently answred this question too in d previous paras <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/D.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />Wel I dun knw like wethr a solution z required cuz 2 my understandin thr zn't a problem, bt as I said, for someone hu stl luk at Sri Lanka like he o she did 50 years back, might feel dat solutions has 2 b given immideatly. Bt I wud like 2 say tho as 2 protect buddhism n some f d practices whr our ancient Sinhaleese had in villages wit the language, some laws has 2 b imposed n regulations on media as media z d one which z getting 2 Sri Lankans fast. The simple reason I wud say that dose thngs tht I mentioned has 2 b protected is because t z really wht z left of Sri Lankan identity tht really distinguishes frm othrs of the wrld, bt nt because t z d so cald true Sri Lankan characteristics.<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy    :)" data-shortname=":)" /> </blockquote>

Verification: Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)

Top Bottom