Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Today at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Yesterday at 8:07 AM
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:58 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Wednesday at 10:23 PM
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Wednesday at 4:54 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
killing animal is a sin in any religion? Answer is below
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wal Bada" data-source="post: 5726116" data-attributes="member: 654"><p>Doctors never say to refrain from eating pork for healthy people. They advise to properly cook it before eating. Of course fro people with illnesses they advise differently. But in that case <strong>beef</strong> is also not advised because of same kind of nutrient profile. Now try to prove what is the wrong concept that I am arguing about? The truth is pork is not harmful for healthy people. In fact beef is more dangerous because of BSE, and the prions are not killed even by prolonged cooking. You cannot accept the truth because you are brain washed. You are the one not seeing the truth because you blindly believe what is said in a certain book.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Once again you show that you are a moron. I said there are more muslims as a percentage suffering from above diseases than other races. The higest number with hypertension in SL are infact SInhalese. But the percentage is lower (say 100 out of 2000 - 5%). Muslims are low in number, but the percentage is high (ex. 10 out of 100 - 10%). Did that explain?</p><p></p><p>Sorry, Buddhists are not discouraged from using animal parts as medicine, or even eating meat. The <strong>intention of the act</strong> is the one which matters in Buddhism. </p><p> </p><p>The Muslim patients who meet with accidents or coming unconscious becomes better with medicine, and after regaining consciousness only he gives his where abouts and family members get to know that their relative is ill. But they have become better without praying. So how to explain that?</p><p></p><p>Without proving you are a cretin please give me the definition of an vegitarian. And BTW, I don't advocate on being a veggie. I am against the double standards of eating meat. Some don't eat pork, some beef without any valid reason. I am against that attitude.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wal Bada, post: 5726116, member: 654"] Doctors never say to refrain from eating pork for healthy people. They advise to properly cook it before eating. Of course fro people with illnesses they advise differently. But in that case [B]beef[/B] is also not advised because of same kind of nutrient profile. Now try to prove what is the wrong concept that I am arguing about? The truth is pork is not harmful for healthy people. In fact beef is more dangerous because of BSE, and the prions are not killed even by prolonged cooking. You cannot accept the truth because you are brain washed. You are the one not seeing the truth because you blindly believe what is said in a certain book. Once again you show that you are a moron. I said there are more muslims as a percentage suffering from above diseases than other races. The higest number with hypertension in SL are infact SInhalese. But the percentage is lower (say 100 out of 2000 - 5%). Muslims are low in number, but the percentage is high (ex. 10 out of 100 - 10%). Did that explain? Sorry, Buddhists are not discouraged from using animal parts as medicine, or even eating meat. The [B]intention of the act[/B] is the one which matters in Buddhism. The Muslim patients who meet with accidents or coming unconscious becomes better with medicine, and after regaining consciousness only he gives his where abouts and family members get to know that their relative is ill. But they have become better without praying. So how to explain that? Without proving you are a cretin please give me the definition of an vegitarian. And BTW, I don't advocate on being a veggie. I am against the double standards of eating meat. Some don't eat pork, some beef without any valid reason. I am against that attitude. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom