ramesh_091 said:ya macho.. bill hamadama monahari hoda deyak post keranawa... don't just find fault in him guys!!!
RAMESH THANK YOU FOR THE COMMENT . MAL & GAL (Stones & Flowers) mama balaporottu wenewaaa owa gaaanak nehe.
ramesh_091 said:ya macho.. bill hamadama monahari hoda deyak post keranawa... don't just find fault in him guys!!!

Podi deyak.zCexVe said:Short and sweet
Kbps=Kilo bits Per Second
KBps=Kilo Bytes Per Second
8 bits = 1 Byte
So x KBps= 8x kbps
512Kbps=64KBps
This is the short note
commercialization is a bad thing..Anusha said:Podi deyak.
kilobits/second = kbps = 1000 bits/second
kilobytes/second = kBps = 1000 bytes/second
* k is simple. but M (in mega), G in (giga) and T (in tera) are written in capitals
Really what we and PCs use are;
KiBps and MiBps etc. which are the 1024 multiples of the previous step. kBps and MBps etc. are 1000 multiples of the previous step.
geethq said:mechcharay
Bit 8 =Byte 1
ube mulu post ekema thiyenne oya tika thamay![]()











wtf are you talking about????kosandpol said:commercialization is a bad thing..
the use of 1000 = 1k for computing.Anusha said:wtf are you talking about????
well, actually it was always 1000 for kilo. 1024 is for "kibi", but computer manufacturers were the the ones who were using kilo for 1024 multiples wrongfully. you can't use the same name and a different multiple in SI units. well, it is true that "kilo" is easier to use than "kibi" and maybe this is why they used kilo in place of kibi.kosandpol said:the use of 1000 = 1k for computing.
This was strictly 1024=1k until hardware manufacturers began using the 1000=1k to denote the capacity in for their high capacity disks
Anusha said:well, actually it was always 1000 for kilo. 1024 is for "kibi", but computer manufacturers were the the ones who were using kilo for 1024 multiples wrongfully. you can't use the same name and a different multiple in SI units. well, it is true that "kilo" is easier to use than "kibi" and maybe this is why they used kilo in place of kibi.
I disagree. They've come up with another naming convention to remove the obscurity in this whole situation. It's fine to use kilo for 1024 multiples but it is not correct.kosandpol said:Ofcause 1000=1k under SI conventions but in computing, since times of yore its 1024 = 1k.