Kilo Bytes Per Second vs. Kilo Bits Per Second (KBps vs. kbps)

Billl Gates

Well-known member
  • May 4, 2008
    11,573
    82
    48
    39
    Pita KOtte
    ramesh_091 said:
    ya macho.. bill hamadama monahari hoda deyak post keranawa... don't just find fault in him guys!!!

    RAMESH THANK YOU FOR THE COMMENT . MAL & GAL (Stones & Flowers) mama balaporottu wenewaaa owa gaaanak nehe.
     

    zCexVe

    Active member
  • Sep 12, 2006
    8,550
    22
    38
    Where I'm now
    Short and sweet

    Kbps=Kilo bits Per Second
    KBps=Kilo Bytes Per Second

    8 bits = 1 Byte

    So x KBps= 8x kbps

    512Kbps=64KBps

    This is the short note :P
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    zCexVe said:
    Short and sweet

    Kbps=Kilo bits Per Second
    KBps=Kilo Bytes Per Second

    8 bits = 1 Byte

    So x KBps= 8x kbps

    512Kbps=64KBps

    This is the short note :P
    Podi deyak.

    kilobits/second = kbps = 1000 bits/second
    kilobytes/second = kBps = 1000 bytes/second
    * k is simple. but M (in mega), G in (giga) and T (in tera) are written in capitals

    Really what we and PCs use are;
    KiBps and MiBps etc. which are the 1024 multiples of the previous step. kBps and MBps etc. are 1000 multiples of the previous step.
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    Anusha said:
    Podi deyak.

    kilobits/second = kbps = 1000 bits/second
    kilobytes/second = kBps = 1000 bytes/second
    * k is simple. but M (in mega), G in (giga) and T (in tera) are written in capitals

    Really what we and PCs use are;
    KiBps and MiBps etc. which are the 1024 multiples of the previous step. kBps and MBps etc. are 1000 multiples of the previous step.
    commercialization is a bad thing..
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    Anusha said:
    wtf are you talking about????
    the use of 1000 = 1k for computing.
    This was strictly 1024=1k until hardware manufacturers began using the 1000=1k to denote the capacity in for their high capacity disks
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    kosandpol said:
    the use of 1000 = 1k for computing.
    This was strictly 1024=1k until hardware manufacturers began using the 1000=1k to denote the capacity in for their high capacity disks
    well, actually it was always 1000 for kilo. 1024 is for "kibi", but computer manufacturers were the the ones who were using kilo for 1024 multiples wrongfully. you can't use the same name and a different multiple in SI units. well, it is true that "kilo" is easier to use than "kibi" and maybe this is why they used kilo in place of kibi.
     

    kosandpol

    Well-known member
  • Jun 10, 2008
    45,329
    1,492
    113
    Anusha said:
    well, actually it was always 1000 for kilo. 1024 is for "kibi", but computer manufacturers were the the ones who were using kilo for 1024 multiples wrongfully. you can't use the same name and a different multiple in SI units. well, it is true that "kilo" is easier to use than "kibi" and maybe this is why they used kilo in place of kibi.

    Ofcause 1000=1k under SI conventions but in computing, since times of yore its 1024 = 1k.
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    kosandpol said:
    Ofcause 1000=1k under SI conventions but in computing, since times of yore its 1024 = 1k.
    I disagree. They've come up with another naming convention to remove the obscurity in this whole situation. It's fine to use kilo for 1024 multiples but it is not correct.