Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="diamonddrago" data-source="post: 7483831" data-attributes="member: 243828"><a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/935861/reasons_why_you_shouldnt_eat_pork.html" target="_blank">http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/935861/reasons_why_you_shouldnt_eat_pork.html</a><a href="http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/porkfacts.html" target="_blank">http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/porkfacts.html</a><a href="http://www.ultimatehealthsolutions.com.au/tohealth.html" target="_blank">http://www.ultimatehealthsolutions.com.au/tohealth.html</a>what does those say?.....what about this....<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Medical_aspects" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#Medical_aspects</a>"Over forty observational studies have been conducted to investigate  the relationship between circumcision and HIV infection.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-153" target="_blank">[154]</a>  Reviews of these studies have reached differing conclusions about  whether circumcision could be used as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS#Prevention" target="_blank">prevention  method against HIV</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-VanHoweHIVmeta-154" target="_blank">[155]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-155" target="_blank">[156]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-156" target="_blank">[157]</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-SiegfriedCochrane2003-157" target="_blank">[158]</a> Experimental evidence was needed to establish a causal relationship  between lack of circumcision and HIV, so three <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trials" target="_blank">randomized  controlled trials</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding" target="_blank">confounding factors</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-SiegfriedCochrane2003-157" target="_blank">[158]</a>  Trials took place in South Africa,<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-ANRS-158" target="_blank">[159]</a>  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya" target="_blank">Kenya</a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-baileyrct-159" target="_blank">[160]</a>  and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda" target="_blank">Uganda</a>.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-160" target="_blank">[161]</a>  All three trials were stopped early by their monitoring boards on  ethical grounds, because those in the circumcised group had a lower rate  of HIV contraction than the control group.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-baileyrct-159" target="_blank">[160]</a>  The results showed that circumcision reduced vaginal-to-penile  transmission of HIV by 60%, 53%, and 51%, respectively.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-Cochrane2009-161" target="_blank">[162]</a>  A meta-analysis of the African randomised controlled trials found that  the risk in circumcised males was 0.44 times that in uncircumcised  males, and that 72 circumcisions would need to be performed to prevent  one HIV infection. The authors also stated that using circumcision as a  means to reduce HIV infection would, on a national level, require  consistently safe sexual practices to maintain the protective benefit.<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-162" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision#cite_note-162</a>" Just because you refuse to use your common sense nor research into my posts......don't blame the quran....that is what lazy racists do....if i am wrong...don't say it...prove me wrong....unconditionally....<img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/oo.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":oo:" title="Oo    :oo:" data-shortname=":oo:" /></blockquote>

Verification: Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?

Top Bottom