Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I love Srilanka" data-source="post: 7602288" data-attributes="member: 244944">My dear friend, it is not some, whatever science so far found proved to be correct.again what is meant by near meaning or not near meaning,meanings is a meaning to describe something. you are under wrong impression that every religion's quote is matching with science. as far as i know Bible is not in line with scientific fact, there r many errors.but abt buddhism I dont know for sure as buddha not talked abt science(some how buddhist escaped due to that).but if u have something which buddha talked abt which is matching with science fact, please put for me with authentic quotation as i put here.when somethings is great how do u want us to call it??again I need to know exactly what Buddha talked abt Galaxy & what scientist proved now? please put with Authentic Quotation...I dont think your explanation for the religion is correct, you are trying to reconcile the Buddhism with the meaning of religion.see Quran is not only talking abt science,(if it talk abt only science you can say as it is not religious book) but,it even talk abt how to lead the life in order to get peaceful life in this life and after death life.whatever you mentioned is are the the misconceptions, and by looking at the muslims you are judging the Islam. if u could study the Quran I am sure you will not say this again.unfortunately many like u , just refer to wat is in Internet which are posted by anti islamist.Albert Einstein or any one he cant be prophet just bec he is a scientist.as they are not good in everything, and they won't be matched quran. human can make errors, but not God's revelations.</blockquote>

Verification: Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom