Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="chamila33" data-source="post: 8699442" data-attributes="member: 1416">machan i can see from all ur replyes that u dont talk to the point u always try to curve the converstation in a way that u humiliate pople wrongly to hide ur own faults thats not a very goodsign not good at all u seem to b a very violent person cintemt on crushin anybody elsees thoughts and perspectives and acting as if what u heard is not relevant and dumb well let me tell u sumtin may b u dont hav the capacity to understand but i will point out the parts which u trried to atleast give me an answer1. this is what u typed in "think to urself buwa.. n read my earlier comment well.. u guyz want a 100% country as soon as possible. if u can name one country that came to a higher level lyk wat u r imagning or lyk watz insid ur mind. answr is NO. thr r no such countries lyk dat. every thng has steps to make, no1 can achieve d final targat lyk u thnk. i wonder y u ppl thnk dat so. tz such an idiotic idea brothr. fully crap. still dont u understand dat? .. "well ur answer explaions a lot abt u ! yes its true rome didnt come up in one day but it came up gradually that means they take small small steps in the positive direction yet is this a possitive step ??? i beg to differ2".here anothr good thing u r teling NOW. all these comments u made, u always stay against wen i said, y ppl drink, y dey go to casinos. datz deir fault.. bt nw u believe dat even increasing prices wil help somehow... znt it? think to urself brothr.. evn u knw datz a good thng wen increasing prices of dat.. hitala balapan.. umba kalin man ehema kiaddi, hina una ne? kiatawat piligatte nahane.. dan umbama kianawane wadi karana hondai, bt karapu gaana madi kiala??"again ur stupidity is at large. yes the tax must b increased by a substantial amount to reduce the consumption. yet increasing it by a mere small amount is not in any way to reduce consumption but to increase the revenue . and ur askin me y i laughed when u said that the 1st itime. the answer is simple bcus the government did that not with the intention of reducing but to fill up their own pockets( i mentioned their cus most of the liqueur licences r owned by the MP's in the 1st place )and u asked me if there was any country that has banned casinos, liqueur ect well the answer is yes there r many countries and states around the world the middle east for example . (as it is against their religion ) and yes it is against the dharma rajaya consept that the government got power under in the 1st place3."here another hillarious thing u made frm ya comment. i can answer this thng frm a simple thng. bro according to ur mind, FROM WHERE GOVERNMENT SHOULD START? u answr me dat... f government make a step to stop something bad, u idiot ppl says there r more urgent things to do. if govrmnt do anthr thng.. u ppl parroting for that lyk stupidz.. u ppl jst need a thought to parrot urselfs. thrs no usefull meaning up there.. datz d truth. "this is most hilairous well in the 1st place does publishing the pictures of the women who appeared in the videos solve any thin? what bat the guys that filmed them ? so does this step stop anythin ? and does bannign porn web sites do anythin in the 1st place? tell me if it is sucesfull? this is jst a valant try to please the public by sayin we did sumtin but the bottom line is every1 knows that porn site cannot b blocked off entirely as new ones come up by the hundreds every day . futher more this is not a personel idea i am statin that this is against the promices the government gave when it came in to power . pls dont change the topic and go off topic to try to escape from the plea u r in . it is more shame full it is indeed a honor to die as a man than live as a snail who slowly slides off ground when the time is rite !</blockquote>

Verification: Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom