Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Anusha" data-source="post: 1206431" data-attributes="member: 828">Sorry but I have to disagree...I'm more than qualified to see that you have a problem with your PC (20% CPU utilization when playing audio? <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/rofl.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":rofl:" title="ROFL    :rofl:" data-shortname=":rofl:" />), that your benchmarking is flowed (told you that already..and you did correct it...BRAVO) and that you gave prominence to the CPU utilization over the audio quality (first post! Quite dumb I would say, 'cos people (at first glance...) might think you are paying USD200-400 to lower the CPU utilization instead of buying a new CPU which would give you much more practical results)Get some practice in (other) forums (where nobody agrees with you)...that's my advice....That'll at least help you with anger management.P.S.I never disagreed with the improved audio quality of a dedicated and good (not all dedicated audio cards can be good....do you know that there are mobo's with integrated Audigy 2 chips?) card compared to integrated solutions. Only question is, is it worth it? For most people, no. For some people yes. For some people who have no idea about audio quality, still a high end card is a must, to balance their systems....After paying USD3000 on a rig, if you are still on integrated audio, he should be shot! Edit: Forgot the bold out the most important part...and some condolence note <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/P.gif"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":P" title=":P    :P" data-shortname=":P" /></blockquote>

Verification: Hathara warak wissa keeyada? (Hathara wadi karanna 20)

Top Bottom