Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
🎮 INDIAN PSN GIFT CARDS AVAILABLE NOW! 🎮
madukaperera
Updated:
Yesterday at 12:57 PM
🚀 Google AI PRO – 18 Months | Rs. 850 Only
lkkolla
Updated:
Monday at 4:56 PM
🔒 NordVPN Premium – 3 Months
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:29 PM
🚀 Microsoft Office 365 Pro Plus – Lifetime Access! 🚀
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:28 PM
Linkedin Premium Business / Careere /Sales Navigator - 1/2/3/6/9/12 Months - Reddem Link
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:27 PM
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
Phenom II vs QX9650 @ 3.81Ghz
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anusha" data-source="post: 3909125" data-attributes="member: 828"><p>Dude! Do you have any idea about games and CPU????</p><p></p><p>In games, you can compare CPU at only low resolutions where the VGA doesn't bottleneck the CPU. At high resolutions, it is the VGA that bottlenecks the CPU. If you are saying AMD performs better at high resolutions, it is not a problem with the CPU, but a problem with the other parts of the system (bus links and PCI-E latencies/bw) that is causing it.</p><p></p><p>And don't compare the QX9650 to P-II 940. QX9650 is an enthusiast CPU. If you want, compare it to the Q9650 which doesn't have a huge price premium that they ask for unlocked CPUs.</p><p></p><p>P.S.</p><p>I don't see what you are saying anyway:</p><p><a href="http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=667&Itemid=27&limit=1&limitstart=5" target="_blank">http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=667&Itemid=27&limit=1&limitstart=5</a></p><p></p><p>You are unfairly comparing a 3GHz CPU to a 2.66GHz CPU I think. U can get even a 920 to 4GHz.</p><p></p><p>Not to say that AMD is crap. But I expected more of them. And I'm not saying you should go out and buy a Corei7 platform either. A Core 2 platform is the way to go, until prices come down.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anusha, post: 3909125, member: 828"] Dude! Do you have any idea about games and CPU???? In games, you can compare CPU at only low resolutions where the VGA doesn't bottleneck the CPU. At high resolutions, it is the VGA that bottlenecks the CPU. If you are saying AMD performs better at high resolutions, it is not a problem with the CPU, but a problem with the other parts of the system (bus links and PCI-E latencies/bw) that is causing it. And don't compare the QX9650 to P-II 940. QX9650 is an enthusiast CPU. If you want, compare it to the Q9650 which doesn't have a huge price premium that they ask for unlocked CPUs. P.S. I don't see what you are saying anyway: [url]http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=667&Itemid=27&limit=1&limitstart=5[/url] You are unfairly comparing a 3GHz CPU to a 2.66GHz CPU I think. U can get even a 920 to 4GHz. Not to say that AMD is crap. But I expected more of them. And I'm not saying you should go out and buy a Corei7 platform either. A Core 2 platform is the way to go, until prices come down. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Awruddata maasa keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom