Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="nadeeshaF" data-source="post: 3002420" data-attributes="member: 119936">Why are you providing a breakdown of gay people in the US, when I already showed you that the number of females is only higher in the older generations due to their longer life span? When I say older, I am referring to women who are 60 or above.  The figures on homosexuality are irrelevent at this point, because where younger women are concerned there are plenty of fish in the sea. The avergae first marriage age in US for women is 25.1 years while it is 26.7 for men.(<a href="http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/fertility/slideshow/table01.csv" target="_blank">http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/fertility/slideshow/table01.csv</a> and <a href="http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/fertility/mar-fert-slides.html" target="_blank">http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/fertility/mar-fert-slides.html</a>)  The fact that there are more men in the age group of 25-29 in the US, than women clearly refutes the ealier argument you presented to me on their being too many women, and too few men, thus allowing for polygamy. In fact it is only men between 25-29 years of age in the US who should worry about finding a partner. Again, your figures on homsexuality are utterly irrelevent here. Can you tell me why you are still harping on it? Are you in denial of your failure? Also, the female:male ratio may differ from country to country, but refer back to wal_bada's post, in which he has given the overall ratio proving that there are more men in this world than women. You've lost both arguments, please accept that and move on.    </blockquote>

Verification: Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)

Top Bottom