Well, it is still over 80k herechanster said:40 to 50k a brand like XFX,Asus etc

I know...Welcome to our world!chanster said:wtf......damn.......who will buy 4 that much......u can make a really good core 2 machine with lcd n everything.......
chanster said:wtf......damn.......who will buy 4 that much......u can make a really good core 2 machine with lcd n everything.......

nVidia doesn't have DX10.1 support btw.chanster said:Yes 8800GT is awesome.....
8800GT will cost around 30 -35k.....n offers similar performance to the expensive GTX....n has new architecture(G92) Direct X 10.1.......GT comes 3rd....
1.Ultra
2.GTX
3.GT
4.GTS
See Here
ATI is a better performer for its prise...but i don't think you can get them in SL.....
Anusha said:nVidia doesn't have DX10.1 support btw.
And the "new" GTS comes at 2nd-3rd.
I didn't say 2nd, nor did I say 3rd. GTS wins where clock speed matter, GTX wins where mem performance matters (bus width x mem clock gives an indication of what is better at memory operations) At high resolutions, card with better memory bandwidth would shine.chanster said:Sorry mate my mistake.....Bt no....GTX still comes 2nd as it beats the G92 GTS in most of the benchmarks with a small lead......well cant say that also......cause both cards have very similar performance........Yeah it should deserve a place ...either 2nd or 3rd.......
I found some benchmarks.....
See Here