Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Today at 3:55 PM
Colombo
Kaduwela - Two Storey House for Sale
dilrasan
Updated:
Thursday at 2:23 PM
Ad icon
Wechat qr verification
Pawan2005
Updated:
Thursday at 1:28 AM
🚀 GOOGLE AI PRO 18 MONTHS ACTIVATION 🚀
sayuru bandara
Updated:
Wednesday at 5:34 PM
Pure VPN - Up to 27 Months
vgp
Updated:
Jun 5, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
Religious
Problem in buddhism
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ela_eluwa120" data-source="post: 12038813" data-attributes="member: 193664"><p><span style="font-size: 15px">එතකොට ඔයා කියන්නෙ</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">All humans have "sithiwili"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">All humans are animals</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">Therefore, all animals have "sithiwili"</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">But machan, <u>if</u> premise#1 is true, it does not follow that your conclusion is true. It simply says that <u>some</u> animals have "sithiwili". So, the original question of whether <u>all</u> animals have "sithiwili"??? remains open.</span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">Consider similar argument which is obviously faulty,</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'"></span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">All rhinos have horns</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">All rhinos are animals</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'Book Antiqua'">Therefore, all animals have horns</span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ela_eluwa120, post: 12038813, member: 193664"] [SIZE="4"]එතකොට ඔයා කියන්නෙ [FONT="Book Antiqua"]All humans have "sithiwili" All humans are animals Therefore, all animals have "sithiwili" But machan, [U]if[/U] premise#1 is true, it does not follow that your conclusion is true. It simply says that [U]some[/U] animals have "sithiwili". So, the original question of whether [U]all[/U] animals have "sithiwili"??? remains open.[/FONT][/SIZE][FONT="Book Antiqua"][/FONT] [SIZE="4"][FONT="Book Antiqua"]Consider similar argument which is obviously faulty, All rhinos have horns All rhinos are animals Therefore, all animals have horns[/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Payakata winadi keeyak tibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom