Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 7294769" data-attributes="member: 262433">Hmm, Actually what I think is that you assumed since most of the people asking questions were Buddhists, you can attack them bringing this same issue with Buddha. However you have a point. But if you have read my posts in this thread you will see that I have agreed several times, that maybe by those days standards it was ok.The original question in the thread is not that which you clearly missed. Let me clarify it to you.(1) It seems that in some Muslim countries child marriages are carried out today.(This is done in non muslim countries also. But I'm talking about muslim countries. That is what this thread is about.)(2) These child marriages in some cases, result in rape(According to todays laws), death (Both because of the bleeding from sex, and in child birth). There are plenty of news on this in the internet if you research.(3) The Islamic leaders in some of these countries claim that Muhammad is their role model and since he married Aisha at the age of 6 it is ok to even marry a 1 year old girl.Q1: What is your opinion of this? Is marrying a child(legally not an adult) ok today??Q2: Why did Muhammad being a prophet of Allah, carry out such an act, knowing its bad effects in the future society?Q3: For a non believer(Also for a believer if he dares to think for himself) does this not bring questions about the morality of Muhammad's actions? Does this not raise the question "Can such a person really be a prophet of GOD?" A was answering to your question about someone being single for his/her entire life. I just said its individual preference. If you are talking about making kids join temples as monks, I already said that it is wrong. Hmm, when I said this must be stopped, I was talking about child monks in Sri Lanka. Are you talking here about child marriages of Islam? Are you asking for proof? I have links,videos and stuff, but anything from internet will not be concrete proof. It's upto you to decide whether there can be any truth in it. My logics says that these incidents appears to be true.That can be true.Not relevant to the topic.True.Hmm, ok. So you assume, keweni is not a human? Fair enough, at least that is what's been taught.History will always change because its the study of past, and its a story. But the facts will remain unchanged. If you think and apply reasonable logic you can get a fair understanding of what is correct and what is not. That is the only way. Also concrete scientific evidence will tell a lot to you. Ex: It is easily understandable that a lion and a human can not mate and have a human child. So it is fair to assume that the story about the lion is a lie.You know there's a chance that even you dad might not know the whole truth. So think for yourself.I know. As I mentioned, This is the sad part of it.</blockquote>

Verification: Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)

Top Bottom