Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 7304627" data-attributes="member: 262433">I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here. I already agreed that in some countries child marriages are done because of cultural reasons.But I also think that in some Muslim countries this is promoted/ excused based on the religion. And I clearly said that I'm not interested in THIS THREAD to talk about those cultural reasons. I'm here to talk about how child marriages are done in ISLAM. I think I'm clear on that. Bringing things from other cultures/religions are not relevant to this topic.Or are you trying to make the point that, child marriages are normal in some countries, cultures, religions so what's wrong with doing it in Islam?Seems like you have not read my previous posts. You just jumped in the middle and assumed I'm an ANTI-ISLAMIC (Which I do not mind now, after seeing this thread. <a href="http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=627000" target="_blank">http://www.elakiri.com/forum/showthread.php?t=627000 </a>) and assumed many other things I see. I have repeatedly said times are different, hence customs can be different.My question contains my definition of a child.And based on your reply, it seems to me that you are ok with having sex with a person disregard of her age, if she reached puberty. So I'm gonna take your opinion on question as "OK".For the nth time, I'm not  talking about the prophet Muhammad. I'm talking about a general case to  explain, that one wrong deed will define a person, In general. My  example makes perfect sense, if you try to understand my motive here is  not to accuse your prophet Muhammad. Yes Harts list gives an idea to you and also to me about prophet Muhammad. Muhammad being the number one clearly says something. Muhammad is one of the most influential persons in history. I do not deny this, It is a simple fact. And unlike you I do not need to look at someones list to understand that. His followers today is a proof of his influence.It amuses me to see that you see being top in the list is some kind of a game, and to see your thrill of finding Hitler was not able to defeat muhammad.I would also like to point out that book represents Hart's idea. There are other people who talk about the same subject. Majority of such Ideologists, and institutions say Jesus Christ was the most influential man in the History.However this is not of importance. Like I said Hitler is also in Harts book, and his rank has no significance to the point. Does influence mean Good?? Not necessarily. Ex: Hitler is also in the list</blockquote>

Verification: Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?

Top Bottom