Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Singapore V2Ray VPN for Tunneling
hu KANNA
Updated:
Monday at 9:03 PM
Plan your Crypto & Forex entries before you take the trade
romeshnonis
Updated:
Monday at 3:20 AM
RHCSA, RHCE, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes Training
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Sep 8, 2026
🛡️ Kaspersky Antivirus – 1 Year / 1 Device | Rs. 2,300 | Only 9 Left
KSPathirana
Updated:
Sep 7, 2026
Ad icon
Professional CCTV Installation Service
Techguy231
Updated:
Sep 6, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Randiv SUXX!!!!
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yasas bandara" data-source="post: 8107044" data-attributes="member: 246044"><p>Former chief selector Chandu Borde, however, felt the Lankans should not be singled out for criticism as all teams have employed such tactics, including India.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“No team wants to allow a batsman to cross the century mark and all the teams in the world have succeeded on number of occasions in denying the batsman of a century. Even we Indians have followed this and never gave a freedom for the batsman to set a mark. It was a brilliant knock by Sehwag, he deserves all accolades,” he said.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“I would not say it as ‘not cricket’ Some people are generous to a fault but others, like the Australians, won’t give you an easy hundred to take. There can be two opinions on this; whether Sri Lanka were unsporting or not.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“I remember (In Delhi in 1958-59 series) against the West Indies I had scored a century (109) in the first innings and was 96 batting in the second with (fast bowler Roy) Gilchrist repeatedly bowling bouncers at me. When two balls remained non-striker Vijay Manjrekar came and told me you have to get to the century. I hooked the next ball, it went for a four but I disturbed my wicket and was hit-wicket,” he recalled.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“In the same match, we didn’t allow Gary Sobers to get to his double hundred when he was on 199. It’s part of the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We Indians have also adopted such strategies. Even local cricket in India is played in that manner,” he said.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Former left arm spinner Bapu Nadkarni felt the six hit by Sehwag off the no ball should have counted.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“The decision of the umpires is puzzling to me. A no-ball is bowled and the match is declared as over. Hypothetically speaking if Sehwag plays a shot and a run-out occurs, then what happens? How do you say the match is over and the ball is dead? It was not dead when Sehwag hit a six.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“I am not an expert on the rules but the no-ball is there to be taken advantage of by the batsman and Sehwag did it,” he opined.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The Hindu.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yasas bandara, post: 8107044, member: 246044"] Former chief selector Chandu Borde, however, felt the Lankans should not be singled out for criticism as all teams have employed such tactics, including India. “No team wants to allow a batsman to cross the century mark and all the teams in the world have succeeded on number of occasions in denying the batsman of a century. Even we Indians have followed this and never gave a freedom for the batsman to set a mark. It was a brilliant knock by Sehwag, he deserves all accolades,” he said. “I would not say it as ‘not cricket’ Some people are generous to a fault but others, like the Australians, won’t give you an easy hundred to take. There can be two opinions on this; whether Sri Lanka were unsporting or not. “I remember (In Delhi in 1958-59 series) against the West Indies I had scored a century (109) in the first innings and was 96 batting in the second with (fast bowler Roy) Gilchrist repeatedly bowling bouncers at me. When two balls remained non-striker Vijay Manjrekar came and told me you have to get to the century. I hooked the next ball, it went for a four but I disturbed my wicket and was hit-wicket,” he recalled. “In the same match, we didn’t allow Gary Sobers to get to his double hundred when he was on 199. It’s part of the game. We Indians have also adopted such strategies. Even local cricket in India is played in that manner,” he said. Former left arm spinner Bapu Nadkarni felt the six hit by Sehwag off the no ball should have counted. “The decision of the umpires is puzzling to me. A no-ball is bowled and the match is declared as over. Hypothetically speaking if Sehwag plays a shot and a run-out occurs, then what happens? How do you say the match is over and the ball is dead? It was not dead when Sehwag hit a six. “I am not an expert on the rules but the no-ball is there to be taken advantage of by the batsman and Sehwag did it,” he opined. The Hindu. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Awruddata maasa keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom