Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
RHCSA, RHCE, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes Training
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Tuesday at 10:28 AM
🛡️ Kaspersky Antivirus – 1 Year / 1 Device | Rs. 2,300 | Only 9 Left
KSPathirana
Updated:
Monday at 2:42 PM
Ad icon
Professional CCTV Installation Service
Techguy231
Updated:
Sunday at 10:50 AM
Ad icon
I'll research & write an article - Rs. 2000 onwards
Blogerwiki
Updated:
Sep 3, 2026
House Plan
lenura
Updated:
Sep 2, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Rohingya refugees in Sri Lanka
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blogerwiki" data-source="post: 31597429" data-attributes="member: 582034"><p>[ATTACH=full]269712[/ATTACH]</p><p>A Rohingya refugee named <strong>Mohammed Anwar</strong> addressed the <strong>63rd Session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)</strong> on September 7, 2026. Speaking on behalf of an international NGO, he publicly pressured the Sri Lankan government to immediately <strong>release 116 Rohingya migrants (including 57 children)</strong> who have been held in tight state detention for over 20 months after being rescued at sea. Most controversially, Anwar officially demanded that Sri Lanka stop labeling them "illegal immigrants" and <strong>consider granting citizenship or permanent residency</strong> to refugees who cannot find a third country to relocate to.</p><p></p><p>This has raised serious concerns among locals, especially since a prosperous country like <strong>Malaysia is currently deporting 1,500 Rohingya</strong> back to Myanmar because their local capacity of 126,000 refugees has completely maxed out. Sri Lanka never intended to host these migrants permanently; the Sri Lankan Navy rescued them strictly under international maritime laws to prevent them from drowning when their human-trafficking boats failed in our waters. Because Sri Lanka has not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, the government's official policy has been to keep them in strict detention as <strong>temporary transit passengers</strong> until a Western nation takes them.</p><p></p><p>There is a growing fear that if the government gives in to this UN pressure, it <strong>may trigger a massive wave of more refugees taking dangerous sea routes to Sri Lanka, expecting to gain permanent residency</strong>. If Sri Lanka transitions from a temporary transit point into a country that grants citizenship to illegal boat arrivals, it could unintentionally turn the island into a primary destination for regional migration loops. What do you think the government should do to handle this situation without compromising national security?</p><hr /><p>source - Reddit</p><p>------ <span style="font-size: 10px">Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1789016085[/DATETIME]</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blogerwiki, post: 31597429, member: 582034"] [ATTACH type="full"]269712[/ATTACH] A Rohingya refugee named [B]Mohammed Anwar[/B] addressed the [B]63rd Session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)[/B] on September 7, 2026. Speaking on behalf of an international NGO, he publicly pressured the Sri Lankan government to immediately [B]release 116 Rohingya migrants (including 57 children)[/B] who have been held in tight state detention for over 20 months after being rescued at sea. Most controversially, Anwar officially demanded that Sri Lanka stop labeling them "illegal immigrants" and [B]consider granting citizenship or permanent residency[/B] to refugees who cannot find a third country to relocate to. This has raised serious concerns among locals, especially since a prosperous country like [B]Malaysia is currently deporting 1,500 Rohingya[/B] back to Myanmar because their local capacity of 126,000 refugees has completely maxed out. Sri Lanka never intended to host these migrants permanently; the Sri Lankan Navy rescued them strictly under international maritime laws to prevent them from drowning when their human-trafficking boats failed in our waters. Because Sri Lanka has not signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, the government's official policy has been to keep them in strict detention as [B]temporary transit passengers[/B] until a Western nation takes them. There is a growing fear that if the government gives in to this UN pressure, it [B]may trigger a massive wave of more refugees taking dangerous sea routes to Sri Lanka, expecting to gain permanent residency[/B]. If Sri Lanka transitions from a temporary transit point into a country that grants citizenship to illegal boat arrivals, it could unintentionally turn the island into a primary destination for regional migration loops. What do you think the government should do to handle this situation without compromising national security? [HR][/HR] source - Reddit ------ [SIZE=2]Post added on [DATETIME="UT"]1789016085[/DATETIME][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dahaya deken beduwama keeyada?
Post reply
Top
Bottom