SC-FR 446-2019 Royal Park Convict Pardons Case

Ramiel

Well-known member
  • Nov 21, 2015
    4,816
    11,813
    113
    In consideration of the grievously abusive, irresponsible, callous and unlawful
    manner in which the 11A Respondent has exercised power vested in the
    President by Article 34 (1) of the Constitution on the occasion of the grant of
    the purported 2' pardon, as a deterrence measure to him and to all those
    holding public office and is vested with power to exercise for specific purposes
    which shall be overall in public interest, the 11A Respondent is directed to pay
    a sum of Rupees One Million to the Petitioner. The Petitioner shall hold such
    money in trust and spend for the purposes that are in the best interests of
    female victims of crime. This sum of money shall be paid within one month of
    this judgment.


    maitre1
     
    • Like
    Reactions: NRTG