Scientific method to analyse ?LRT done

[neo76]

A friend of mine told me the following.
Therefore I thought of sharing this information.

According to him, there is no way of objectively assess whether LRT done or not. Neither ultrasound , nor CT/ MRI can confidently tell that. Furthermore, no one is going to operate a female, to assess, whether her Fallopian tubes are damaged.

However, there is a reliable method, to get this information using statistics. We could statistically compare the normal population (people who underwent cesarean surgery by other doctors) and the test population. (people who underwent cesarean surgery by the said doctor) If there is a significant different (P<0.05) of the fertility after surgery of the test population, then, the result is OBVIOUS.

 

[Pessimist]

TFS

 

[topkollek]

I think it can be done.

https://www.gfmer.ch/Books/Endoscopy_book/Ch12_tuba_endo.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falloposcopy

 

[imhotep]

I think it can be done.

https://www.gfmer.ch/Books/Endoscopy_book/Ch12_tuba_endo.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falloposcopy

These are invasive...There are other methods too but not available n SL.
The main issue is whether anyone collected all the information about this.
How many women who didn't subsequently fall pregnant after surgery performed by this doctor has come forwards so far?
One cannot establish the facts unless a proper investigation is done. I am not implying that this doctor is innocent - but the truth has to be investigated.

 

[neo76]

Yes.
Exactly.
Who wants to do invasive studies.