Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
🔒 NordVPN Premium – 3 Months
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:29 PM
🚀 Microsoft Office 365 Pro Plus – Lifetime Access! 🚀
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:28 PM
Linkedin Premium Business / Careere /Sales Navigator - 1/2/3/6/9/12 Months - Reddem Link
hrdilshan
Updated:
Thursday at 8:27 PM
Colombo
YEYE 3 in 1 Instant Coffee Mix 50 Sachet
Romeshka
Updated:
Wednesday at 12:16 AM
Colombo
Red Hat Certified System Administrator (RHCSA) - RHEL 10
Sanjeewani95
Updated:
Jul 3, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
Shedding Light on Dark Gamma Ray Bursts
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tharinda07" data-source="post: 4921282" data-attributes="member: 21844"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px"><u>Shedding Light on Dark Gamma Ray Bursts</u></span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">Gamma-ray bursts are the universe's biggest explosions, capable of producing so much light that ground-based telescopes easily detect it billions of light-years away. Yet, for more than a decade, astronomers have puzzled over the nature of so-called dark bursts, which produce gamma rays and X-rays but little or no visible light. They make up roughly half of the bursts detected by NASA's Swift satellite since its 2004 launch.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p> <span style="font-size: 12px">Using one of the world's largest optical telescopes, the Keck I in Hawaii, researchers looked for unknown galaxies at the locations of 14 Swift-discovered dark bursts.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px">In this image, dense knots of dust in otherwise normal galaxies dim the light of a dark gamma-ray burst (center). The dust absorbs most or all of a burst's visible light but not higher-energy X-rays and gamma rays. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 12px"><em>Image Credit NASA/Swift/Aurore Simonnet</em></span> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/360653main_image_1388_946-710.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tharinda07, post: 4921282, member: 21844"] [B][SIZE=5][U]Shedding Light on Dark Gamma Ray Bursts[/U][/SIZE][/B] [SIZE=3] Gamma-ray bursts are the universe's biggest explosions, capable of producing so much light that ground-based telescopes easily detect it billions of light-years away. Yet, for more than a decade, astronomers have puzzled over the nature of so-called dark bursts, which produce gamma rays and X-rays but little or no visible light. They make up roughly half of the bursts detected by NASA's Swift satellite since its 2004 launch. Using one of the world's largest optical telescopes, the Keck I in Hawaii, researchers looked for unknown galaxies at the locations of 14 Swift-discovered dark bursts. In this image, dense knots of dust in otherwise normal galaxies dim the light of a dark gamma-ray burst (center). The dust absorbs most or all of a burst's visible light but not higher-energy X-rays and gamma rays. [I]Image Credit NASA/Swift/Aurore Simonnet[/I][/SIZE] [IMG]http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/360653main_image_1388_946-710.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom