Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
ඕනම රටකට සෙට් වෙන CV එකක්
ErMurazor
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:50 AM
Hambantota
7 Acres Beachfront Land For Sell DownSouth , PerPerch Price 420 000
1024 Digital
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:57 AM
Baseus PI LITE INDOOR CAMERA
ErMurazor
Updated:
Monday at 12:26 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
Hard Disk For Sale
mazza
Updated:
Oct 10, 2026
land for sale
justasking
Updated:
Oct 10, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
SLT unlimited Entertainment අලුත් වැඩේ 22/06/2020 22:22 Hrs
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="vito" data-source="post: 25472742" data-attributes="member: 97913"><p>when ISPs can categorize and promote traffic (Google, Netflix, apple etc) the next possibel step they can take is traffic priority, even artificially.</p><p>what's to say they wouldn't promote their own service or highest paying business over the others? suddenly one service seems faster than the other </p><p>they can slow down certain sites or protocols (bittorrent is a good example) while allowing others to operate normally.</p><p>besides think about it like this: if the data caps here were more reasonable they wouldn't be able to sell all these entertainment "packages" like this and rake in more money. right?</p><p>they're using the same bandwidth, but by differentiating it they get to charge more</p><p>lapping it up to a simple economic gain is a slippery slope to more restrictive BS <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy :)" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/default/happy.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Happy :)" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p>consumers should be more aware of what's happening</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="vito, post: 25472742, member: 97913"] when ISPs can categorize and promote traffic (Google, Netflix, apple etc) the next possibel step they can take is traffic priority, even artificially. what's to say they wouldn't promote their own service or highest paying business over the others? suddenly one service seems faster than the other they can slow down certain sites or protocols (bittorrent is a good example) while allowing others to operate normally. besides think about it like this: if the data caps here were more reasonable they wouldn't be able to sell all these entertainment "packages" like this and rake in more money. right? they're using the same bandwidth, but by differentiating it they get to charge more lapping it up to a simple economic gain is a slippery slope to more restrictive BS :):) consumers should be more aware of what's happening [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hata thunen beduwama keeyada? (60 bedeema thuna)
Post reply
Top
Bottom