SMOKING_Plz Because it is SHOCKING

[Samantha567]

Repost nam Sorry....

Wade elakiri nam Comments denna...
Rep 1k denna amathaka karannath epa...

 

[Samantha567]

 

[Samantha567]

Oyalage Comments denna

 

[sirajstc]

Good post rep +

 

[sirajstc]

mewa nam repost unath kamak ne he

 

[somadasa]

 

[Samantha567]

mewa nam repost unath kamak ne he

Ow Ow Eka atta... Thanx

 

[sirajstc]

Ela

 

[Samantha567]

Pissu Pusek ne banz Mokakkda Brand 1k? Goldleaf da?

 

[Samantha567]

Ela

Thawa Pic thiyenawa Up karanna kammali ban

 

[somadasa]

Pissu Pusek ne banz Mokakkda Brand 1k? Goldleaf da?

 

[Samantha567]

Ela Ela Ohoma yamuko

 

[sirajstc]

Thawa Pic thiyenawa Up karanna kammali ban

mage gaawa tibba mama puluwan unoth den dannam

 

[sirajstc]

Over the past 40 years, smoking has declined by about half, thanks in part to anti-smoking media campaigns.

But anti-tobacco messages and ads often face fierce opposition from the cigarette manufacturers who have worked vigorously to diminish their impact.

Anti-smoking ads began in the late 1960s when the FCC deemed cigarette smoking controversial and therefore subject to the Fairness Doctrine, which requires opening the airwaves to public service messages on opposing viewpoints. The ads were very effective in reducing smoking, despite vigorous counter-advertising by the tobacco companies. (According to a 1972 study, anti-smoking ads cut cigarette smoking by 531 cigarettes per person per year, while tobacco company advertising increased consumption by only 95 cigarettes per person per year.)

 

[sirajstc]

me tika issarata danna

 

[Samantha567]

mage gaawa tibba mama puluwan unoth den dannam

Elakiri machan

 

[Samantha567]

me tika issarata danna

Ok

 

[Samantha567]

Over the past 40 years, smoking has declined by about half, thanks in part to anti-smoking media campaigns.

But anti-tobacco messages and ads often face fierce opposition from the cigarette manufacturers who have worked vigorously to diminish their impact.

Anti-smoking ads began in the late 1960s when the FCC deemed cigarette smoking controversial and therefore subject to the Fairness Doctrine, which requires opening the airwaves to public service messages on opposing viewpoints. The ads were very effective in reducing smoking, despite vigorous counter-advertising by the tobacco companies. (According to a 1972 study, anti-smoking ads cut cigarette smoking by 531 cigarettes per person per year, while tobacco company advertising increased consumption by only 95 cigarettes per person per year.)

Thanx banz

 

[koondeGoda]

niceeeeeeeeeeeee

 

[sirajstc]

Elakiri machan

Ok

Thanx banz