SpaceX Falcon Heavy Animation Music Video - OFFICIAL VIDEO

hancok

Well-known member
  • Aug 16, 2008
    36,592
    19,043
    113
    පිළි-ඇඳි-දොළ
    sure naa bn, spacex eka berune nasa eken munta iss eke wada walata one dewal supply karanna contract ekak dunna nisa. eka nasa dunne nathnam spacex fail wela godak kal.

    anith eka bn nasa eka rocket company ekakmath nemeine, un space research, science ganane pradanawa karanne, unta e wade karaganna rocket nathi nisai untama rocket hadaganna une. issarahata wenas wei. nasa ekata puluwan dan unma mula idan rocket hadanne nathuwa spacex eken hire karala unge satellites, cameras space ekata yawala, ithuru una rocket hadanna yana salli walin reasearch walata wadiyen wiyadama karanna.
    mamanam hithanne meka nisa spacex & nasa dekatama positive kiyala.
    :love:

    kohomath anunge badu orbit karana contract wada danatamath china india karanawa:yes:. yoshitha baby ge satellite ekath giye ehemane
     

    Indika Buddika

    Well-known member
  • Jul 29, 2016
    6,586
    6,835
    113
    kohomath anunge badu orbit karana contract wada danatamath china india karanawa:yes:. yoshitha baby ge satellite ekath giye ehemane
    :yes::yes::yes:
    Habai reusable rockets nisa SpaceX ekata godak aduwata karanna puluwan wei, anith eka ithin india, china walata wada us & russia walata space industry eka gana experience wadine.
     

    chamil32

    Well-known member
  • Dec 5, 2009
    17,013
    1,692
    113
    Matara
    අපරාදේ බන්. main engin එකත් ලස්සනට land කරානම් තමි පට්ට. signal loss වෙද්දී මට හිතුන ජින්ගිමාල් එකක් වෙලා ඇති කියල :(:(:(

    videos nadda machan ?
     

    WhiteWalker

    Member
    Sep 15, 2015
    18,612
    1,328
    0
    16
    North
    Why do scientists believe that radiation will tear the Starman's roadster, launched towards Mars, into pieces within a year, and if true how do we send probes to Mars and not have the same thing happen to them?

    Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist
    Answered 2h ago
    Don’t believe everything you read on Fox News.

    Radiation will most certainly damage that Tesla over time. For starters, ultraviolet light from the Sun will cause its shiny red finish to fade fairly quickly. Plastic parts, such as the steering wheel or the seats will begin to break down, possibly within weeks, maybe months. It won’t take long… chemical bonds really hate UV light. But structural bits, metal parts probably won’t be affected for a very, very long time.

    I don’t know how much of the Tesla’s electronics were kept in this vehicle as it was prepared for launch, but it is pretty obvious that the car’s electronics were unpowered. They would probably not operate correctly if powered, because of unshielded circuits and components that are not hardened against ionizing radiation. Over time, the same radiation will permanently damage parts, starting with (I think) prematurely erasing any flash memory by flipping bits at random, but ultimately even destroying some semiconductor junctions.

    I am pretty sure that the Tesla on board had its batteries removed. Taking those batteries to an untested environment would have been a serious, foolish, unnecessary risk. For the same reason, I suspect that all other fluids (e.g., A/C working fluid, hydraulic fluids) were fully drained before launch. So that’s not an issue, really.

    However, thermal stress is. If you recall, the Tesla was slowly rotating in the video feed. That means that different parts were continuously exposed to either unfiltered solar radiation or the cold of deep space. Thermal management is a very important aspect of space probe design, and very obviously a terrestrial automobile was not designed that way. This thermal stress will likely cause serious damage over time, causing things to stress, crack, break, etc.

    Having said all that… I suspect that, though damaged (with faded finish, decomposed plastic parts, maybe a cracked windshield and other signs of wear, not to mention a few tiny burn marks from micrometeoroid impacts) this Tesla will survive far longer as a recognizable road vehicle than any of its terrestrial counterparts, including models that eventually end up in a museum. I suspect that even thousands of years from now, if someone stumbles upon Musk’s Tesla, it will still look very much like an automobile.
     

    Indika Buddika

    Well-known member
  • Jul 29, 2016
    6,586
    6,835
    113
    Why do scientists believe that radiation will tear the Starman's roadster, launched towards Mars, into pieces within a year, and if true how do we send probes to Mars and not have the same thing happen to them?

    Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist
    Answered 2h ago
    Don’t believe everything you read on Fox News.

    Radiation will most certainly damage that Tesla over time. For starters, ultraviolet light from the Sun will cause its shiny red finish to fade fairly quickly. Plastic parts, such as the steering wheel or the seats will begin to break down, possibly within weeks, maybe months. It won’t take long… chemical bonds really hate UV light. But structural bits, metal parts probably won’t be affected for a very, very long time.

    I don’t know how much of the Tesla’s electronics were kept in this vehicle as it was prepared for launch, but it is pretty obvious that the car’s electronics were unpowered. They would probably not operate correctly if powered, because of unshielded circuits and components that are not hardened against ionizing radiation. Over time, the same radiation will permanently damage parts, starting with (I think) prematurely erasing any flash memory by flipping bits at random, but ultimately even destroying some semiconductor junctions.

    I am pretty sure that the Tesla on board had its batteries removed. Taking those batteries to an untested environment would have been a serious, foolish, unnecessary risk. For the same reason, I suspect that all other fluids (e.g., A/C working fluid, hydraulic fluids) were fully drained before launch. So that’s not an issue, really.

    However, thermal stress is. If you recall, the Tesla was slowly rotating in the video feed. That means that different parts were continuously exposed to either unfiltered solar radiation or the cold of deep space. Thermal management is a very important aspect of space probe design, and very obviously a terrestrial automobile was not designed that way. This thermal stress will likely cause serious damage over time, causing things to stress, crack, break, etc.

    Having said all that… I suspect that, though damaged (with faded finish, decomposed plastic parts, maybe a cracked windshield and other signs of wear, not to mention a few tiny burn marks from micrometeoroid impacts) this Tesla will survive far longer as a recognizable road vehicle than any of its terrestrial counterparts, including models that eventually end up in a museum. I suspect that even thousands of years from now, if someone stumbles upon Musk’s Tesla, it will still look very much like an automobile.
    :shocked::rofl::P:D:D