Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Sunday at 8:26 PM
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
Colombo
PXN V10 Pro Direct Drive Racing Wheel (Under Warranty)
Abdur Rahman
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Ad icon
USDT ණය සේවාව - USDT Loan Service
පුරවැසියා
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
SpaceX Falcon Heavy Animation Music Video - OFFICIAL VIDEO
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhiteWalker" data-source="post: 22830298" data-attributes="member: 548558"><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Why do scientists believe that radiation will tear the Starman's roadster, launched towards Mars, into pieces within a year, and if true how do we send probes to Mars and not have the same thing happen to them?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Answered 2h ago</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Don’t believe everything you read on Fox News.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Radiation will most certainly damage that Tesla over time. For starters, ultraviolet light from the Sun will cause its shiny red finish to fade fairly quickly. Plastic parts, such as the steering wheel or the seats will begin to break down, possibly within weeks, maybe months. It won’t take long… chemical bonds really hate UV light. But structural bits, metal parts probably won’t be affected for a very, very long time.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">I don’t know how much of the Tesla’s electronics were kept in this vehicle as it was prepared for launch, but it is pretty obvious that the car’s electronics were unpowered. They would probably not operate correctly if powered, because of unshielded circuits and components that are not hardened against ionizing radiation. Over time, the same radiation will permanently damage parts, starting with (I think) prematurely erasing any flash memory by flipping bits at random, but ultimately even destroying some semiconductor junctions.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">I am pretty sure that the Tesla on board had its batteries removed. Taking those batteries to an untested environment would have been a serious, foolish, unnecessary risk. For the same reason, I suspect that all other fluids (e.g., A/C working fluid, hydraulic fluids) were fully drained before launch. So that’s not an issue, really.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">However, thermal stress is. If you recall, the Tesla was slowly rotating in the video feed. That means that different parts were continuously exposed to either unfiltered solar radiation or the cold of deep space. Thermal management is a very important aspect of space probe design, and very obviously a terrestrial automobile was not designed that way. This thermal stress will likely cause serious damage over time, causing things to stress, crack, break, etc.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Having said all that… I suspect that, though damaged (with faded finish, decomposed plastic parts, maybe a cracked windshield and other signs of wear, not to mention a few tiny burn marks from micrometeoroid impacts) this Tesla will survive far longer as a recognizable road vehicle than any of its terrestrial counterparts, including models that eventually end up in a museum. I suspect that even thousands of years from now, if someone stumbles upon Musk’s Tesla, it will still look very much like an automobile.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhiteWalker, post: 22830298, member: 548558"] [size=4]Why do scientists believe that radiation will tear the Starman's roadster, launched towards Mars, into pieces within a year, and if true how do we send probes to Mars and not have the same thing happen to them? Viktor T. Toth, IT pro, part-time physicist Answered 2h ago Don’t believe everything you read on Fox News. Radiation will most certainly damage that Tesla over time. For starters, ultraviolet light from the Sun will cause its shiny red finish to fade fairly quickly. Plastic parts, such as the steering wheel or the seats will begin to break down, possibly within weeks, maybe months. It won’t take long… chemical bonds really hate UV light. But structural bits, metal parts probably won’t be affected for a very, very long time. I don’t know how much of the Tesla’s electronics were kept in this vehicle as it was prepared for launch, but it is pretty obvious that the car’s electronics were unpowered. They would probably not operate correctly if powered, because of unshielded circuits and components that are not hardened against ionizing radiation. Over time, the same radiation will permanently damage parts, starting with (I think) prematurely erasing any flash memory by flipping bits at random, but ultimately even destroying some semiconductor junctions. I am pretty sure that the Tesla on board had its batteries removed. Taking those batteries to an untested environment would have been a serious, foolish, unnecessary risk. For the same reason, I suspect that all other fluids (e.g., A/C working fluid, hydraulic fluids) were fully drained before launch. So that’s not an issue, really. However, thermal stress is. If you recall, the Tesla was slowly rotating in the video feed. That means that different parts were continuously exposed to either unfiltered solar radiation or the cold of deep space. Thermal management is a very important aspect of space probe design, and very obviously a terrestrial automobile was not designed that way. This thermal stress will likely cause serious damage over time, causing things to stress, crack, break, etc. Having said all that… I suspect that, though damaged (with faded finish, decomposed plastic parts, maybe a cracked windshield and other signs of wear, not to mention a few tiny burn marks from micrometeoroid impacts) this Tesla will survive far longer as a recognizable road vehicle than any of its terrestrial counterparts, including models that eventually end up in a museum. I suspect that even thousands of years from now, if someone stumbles upon Musk’s Tesla, it will still look very much like an automobile.[/size] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Dawasata paya keeyak thibeda?
Post reply
Top
Bottom