Sri Lanka hospital attack>>Doctor says 49 killed

Mal Aiyya

Member
Feb 19, 2008
7,454
65
0
Peradeniya Mal Waththe...
Doctor says 49 killed in Sri Lanka hospital attack


By RAVI NESSMAN, Associated Press Writer Ravi Nessman, Associated Press Writer – 47 mins ago




COLOMBO, Sri Lanka – A mortar shell struck the only functioning medical facility in Sri Lanka's northern war zone Tuesday morning, killing 49 patients and bystanders and wounding more than 50 others, a government health official said. It was the second time this month that the facility was hit.

The attack came after a weekend of heavy shelling that killed hundreds of civilians trapped in the war zone. The military has denied accusations that it was still shelling the tiny coastal strip under rebel control, which is packed with an estimated 50,000 civilians.
Dr. Thurairaja Varatharajah, the top government health official in the war zone, said a single mortar shell hit the admissions ward in the makeshift hospital Tuesday morning. In addition to the 49 killed, scores of others were wounded, and he expected the death toll to rise, he said.

Shells were still hitting the area hours later, including one that landed about 150 yards (meters) from the hospital, Varatharajah said.
A second hospital official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, said a hospital administrator was among those killed.
It was the second time this month that the facility had come under heavy fire. On May 2, 64 civilians died when the hospital was hit by artillery.
Reports of the fighting are difficult to verify because the government bars journalists and aid workers from the war zone.

Rebel spokesman Seevaratnam Puleedevan blamed the attack on the government, and said civilians were fleeing in all directions inside the tiny war zone, seeking safety.
"There's no place to seek shelter or protect themselves," he said.
He called on the international community to force the government to stop its offensive against the violent separatist group, which has been fighting for a homeland for the ethnic Tamil minority for more than a quarter century.

"We are really afraid that if the Sri Lankan government is not being pressured to stop the carnage, that many more civilians will die in the hundreds," he said.
Sri Lankan defense spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella denied the army had launched the attack. He said government forces had not launched any airstrikes or artillery into the area.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Monday that he was "appalled at the killings of hundreds of civilians in Sri Lanka over the weekend. Thousands of Sri Lankans have already died in the past several months due to the conflict, and more still remain in grave danger."

In a statement, Ban reiterated his call for both parties to cease using heavy weapons and accused the rebels of "reckless disrespect" for the safety of civilians. Human rights groups accuse the rebels — who are listed as a terror group by the U.S. and E.U. — of keeping the civilians hostage for use as human shields.

Two overnight artillery barrages pounded the area over the weekend, with several shells landing inside newly demarcated "safe zone," where the government had urged civilians to gather, according to Dr. V. Shanmugarajah, another doctor at the hospital.
A total of 430 ethnic Tamil civilians, including 106 children, were either brought to the hospital for burial or died at the facility after those attacks, he said. But the death toll was likely closer to 1,000 because many of those killed would have been buried in the bunkers where they were slain, and many of the gravely wounded never made it to the hospital for treatment, he said.

The shelling attacks — which the U.N. labeled a "bloodbath" — marked some of the worst violence in this Indian Ocean island nation since the civil war flared up again more than three years ago.

In New York, the British, French and Austrian foreign ministers urged the U.N. Security Council to take action to prevent more killings of civilians. Sri Lanka is not on the Security Council agenda because Russia, China, Japan and Vietnam consider the fighting an internal matter.

"Are we waiting, all of us, to the end of the bombing, to the end of any life — not only suffering, but any life in this siege pocket?" asked French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner.

U.N. figures compiled last month showed that nearly 6,500 civilians had been killed in three months this year as the government drove the separatist rebels from their northern strongholds and vowed to end the war.

The rebels, listed as a terror group by the U.S. and the EU, blamed the artillery assaults on the government. Human Rights Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe denied the government was responsible and claimed health officials in the area were under pressure from the rebels to lie.

Army troops pushed further into the remaining rebel territory Monday, killing dozens of rebels in fierce fighting. Military spokesman Brig. Udaya Nanayakkara said troops found 35 rebel bodies after the fighting. He did not provide details on casualties suffered by army.


Edith Lederer contributed to this report from the United Nations
 
Last edited:

Mal Aiyya

Member
Feb 19, 2008
7,454
65
0
Peradeniya Mal Waththe...
I dont know for sure whether this shelling really took place.

But this was prime news on Yahoo for the past 1 hour.

The news report has been compiled by a US press journalist with direct aid of an agent from the UN
 

Mal Aiyya

Member
Feb 19, 2008
7,454
65
0
Peradeniya Mal Waththe...
casper_fms said:
this all liers... they only support LTTE.. they want to protect VP not the innocent civilians...

Hmm ya its possible.

But my point is that WOULD Yahoo, a responsilbe internet media unit publish such a news that can create havoc, without a base?

And there is a report released by the UN, upon which this news item has been drafted
 

sajithd

Well-known member
  • Aug 3, 2007
    2,688
    80
    48
    uNkOWn
    it's completely insane. i mean government has stopped shell attacks. It's just another attamp of LTTE and it's supporters to crate a havoc among international community in order to stop the war save prabhakaran. As a popular and well recognized website yahoo should be more responsible about their news and about their sources.

    :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
     

    akolla

    Active member
  • May 29, 2007
    1,496
    4
    38
    Mal Aiyya said:
    Hmm ya its possible.

    But my point is that WOULD Yahoo, a responsilbe internet media unit publish such a news that can create havoc, without a base?

    And there is a report released by the UN, upon which this news item has been drafted


    we shouldn't be much surprised yahoo did it, besides most of the other international media that claim to be unbiased have acted rusty.

    here is another story by yahoo,
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090510/ap_on_re_as/as_sri_lanka_civil_war
     

    sajithd

    Well-known member
  • Aug 3, 2007
    2,688
    80
    48
    uNkOWn
    akolla said:
    we shouldn't be much surprised yahoo did it, besides most of the other international media that claim to be unbiased have acted rusty.

    here is another story by yahoo,
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090510/ap_on_re_as/as_sri_lanka_civil_war
    yes i completely agree with u. not only yahoo but also foreign media such as BBC, CNN, an local media such as sirasa have proved that they are supporting LTTE. So what's the point of reading their stories. they claims that they are unbiased. but really r they? :no: :no: :no: :no: :no:
     

    lkdood

    Member
    Apr 7, 2008
    56,856
    1,798
    0
    Washington, D.C. / London, U.K.
    Mal Aiyya said:
    The Government would have prooven that the UN is NOT TRUSTWORTHTY firts of all and reliable, and also that there are many US and UK news reporting services that oughta be banned
    :lol:

    mal aiyya

    dan UN, red cross kotiya wela ne ? :rolleyes:

    ban all media except ITN/Rupavahini :rofl:

    ban UN , ban red cross

    ban everything :rofl:

    ubala bilada ? post dan ne :rofl:
     

    Mal Aiyya

    Member
    Feb 19, 2008
    7,454
    65
    0
    Peradeniya Mal Waththe...
    Ya ya what you all say about this being fake is possible.

    But why do you all think so? I mean, your bases are that LTTE is forcing them into this, but whats the logical, practical and realistic reason begind this that you'll see?
     

    earthling

    Well-known member
  • Jun 15, 2006
    5,873
    5,132
    113
    look people..gov have not stoped shelling ? I dont know how true this hospital thing is but we did use arti on the 10th....

    wonder how we captured the bunds & infiltrated the NFZ ? what do u expect ?

    its open ground..without arti suport r soldiers would die needlessly from sniper fire alone... we need cover.... inorder to protect the civis 100s of er soldiers should die because of direct gunfire/LTTE arti & sniper fire when we try to cross the open space to get to the bunds ?

    so we may have used arti...and LTTE does use civis as shields..we all know that..they position arti guns in civilian camps so that when we fire back the civis get hit...

    did u know that many LTTE carders are now in civi cloths...so if we hit a machine gun nest with LTTE carders =wearing civilian cloths...they take away the guns..take pics of the fallen LTTE carders in civi cloths & publish the pics all over the net saying "We killed civis"

    We cannot win this propaganda war.... but we cannot stop now as well...civis will get killed..this is a WAR...what do u expect ?
     

    Mal Aiyya

    Member
    Feb 19, 2008
    7,454
    65
    0
    Peradeniya Mal Waththe...
    lkdood said:
    :lol:

    mal aiyya

    dan UN, red cross kotiya wela ne ? :rolleyes:

    ban all media except ITN/Rupavahini :rofl:

    ban UN , ban red cross

    ban everything :rofl:

    ubala bilada ? post dan ne :rofl:

    Naha naha... ethana podi exaggeration ekak damme.

    My point there was that if the SL Government, or anybody for that matter, prooves that this is totally fake, then it would proove that those Media units published totally untrue news incidents.

    This would result in a fulltime loss in goodwill and name of the particular media unit, and probably can be legally sued by the Government for publishing this, which dented the name of the SL government severly, and also posed probablte enforcements by powerful international influences to immediately halt the war.