Support Srilankan Music! Comment now!

amila325

Well-known member
  • Jul 11, 2006
    9,188
    33
    48
    Lich said:
    umba india we ekek da.. he he.. nattam india wala ekek umbata mokak hari kalada
    hi hi hi man hithuweth ehenmai ath ithin eyatath eya kemathi de kiyanna puluwanne .
     

    amila325

    Well-known member
  • Jul 11, 2006
    9,188
    33
    48
    man dan ahuwa a song eka. shit it is the same melody and stuff ne. meaning ekanam danne ne man. anyway it should be removed.
     

    exceed

    Member
    Jun 8, 2006
    1,484
    1
    0
    CMB
    im teling this. music is a world language. Bathiya is copying song much. evein his first album. but they didnt come to take legal action for BnS know? this is the thing, Iraj is a great talented person. we are listening his songs, we are playing his songs in Djs, thatz are happeing songs. but if he thinks that this is a bad thing, thatz a great bad idea. if its what is mata sithanna ba, Aloke, but he didnt put any details about the original tracks in the CD. then anyone think that thats his own creation. GTRZ, if you think that im going to blame Iraj, it s not a thing. this is the reality. plz dnt misunderstand me. im aggry with Mozart too.

    and the thing is this is a good opportunity for Iraj coz if som one took his tune thatz a big thing.

    (amaradeva also has copied a song, but the first owner didnt tell anythung to Amaradeva know?)

    however, if he thinks that he wnts to tak som legal action, according to Sri lanaka we hv to support him
     

    Rino

    Member
    Sep 8, 2007
    2
    0
    0
    37
    Collombo
    you are rigght.But Iraj has taken permition to Mata Sithana Ba from Rukmani Deevi Sansadaya.So this damn Indians didn't take licens from Iraj.
     

    GTRZ

    Administrator
    Staff member
  • Apr 27, 2006
    19,480
    10,860
    113
    exceed said:
    im teling this. music is a world language. Bathiya is copying song much. evein his first album. but they didnt come to take legal action for BnS know? this is the thing, Iraj is a great talented person. we are listening his songs, we are playing his songs in Djs, thatz are happeing songs. but if he thinks that this is a bad thing, thatz a great bad idea. if its what is mata sithanna ba, Aloke, but he didnt put any details about the original tracks in the CD. then anyone think that thats his own creation. GTRZ, if you think that im going to blame Iraj, it s not a thing. this is the reality. plz dnt misunderstand me. im aggry with Mozart too.

    and the thing is this is a good opportunity for Iraj coz if som one took his tune thatz a big thing.

    (amaradeva also has copied a song, but the first owner didnt tell anythung to Amaradeva know?)

    however, if he thinks that he wnts to tak som legal action, according to Sri lanaka we hv to support him
    Well machan i don't care even if you blame anyone with proper facts. I am not favoring any artist here. What i tried to point out was people shouting without any prove who has the legal rights and who don't have. And people think india is the originator and we are all just copying from them. Anyway if you read my other posts you can get more info.

    Anyway this new fact about adding old melody owners name with the new production is ethical. But actually copyright law or general business world don't like to use that method. So it should be changed from the law depending on how much you took from the old track.
    If i give you examples tons of young people and new bands from india reproduce old melody and worst than that remix same original track without any change. They sell it play over the world, play on MTV etc.. without even saying name of the old melody or the owners. even lot of films are like that based on a old film but they don't say the info in public in a proper way. From the law after you pay them you can make the owner silent from a legal agreement. Its so common in western countries, asia and all over the world.
    Related to media industry google acquired youtube never say whoz the original owner or anything. Adobe acquired macromedia, flikr, e-groups from yahoo etc..
    As i think from the law it should be changed. But it depends on the people in the media industry around the world. If most of them liked it then you can change the law.

    About Amaradewa using the other persons melody i think its related to my previous post about srilankan singers going to india to learn music and working with them. Using the music of indian gurus etc.. Anyway i am not sure its applicable to the specific track you talking about.
     

    GTRZ

    Administrator
    Staff member
  • Apr 27, 2006
    19,480
    10,860
    113
    Dan01 said:
    hamada kopy karana iraj ta honda vade.....
    hehe Hey please read the thread before making comments machan. post with facts and something to support and prove your idea.

    Iraj copied from your song? Feels like that from what you were saying.
     

    Mayuka_sl

    Member
    Sep 17, 2007
    65
    1
    0
    Pitakotte
    Indian are ******* wrong!

    This is damn, ******* wrong !!! Iraj should take action about this!! This is a Srilankan Creation and this song should Go arround the world as A SRILANKAN CREATION!! not as a indian copy!! We shall support you!!!
     

    thummu

    Member
    Aug 9, 2006
    19
    0
    0
    yeah man if we can copy their music why cant they do the same i mean cmon man finaly they started to copy us thats huge machan do u feel me .... keep up the good work iraj..... finaly we have rock the india hoooooooo hooooooooooo