Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
ඕනම රටකට සෙට් වෙන CV එකක්
ErMurazor
Updated:
Today at 9:50 AM
Hambantota
7 Acres Beachfront Land For Sell DownSouth , PerPerch Price 420 000
1024 Digital
Updated:
Wednesday at 11:57 AM
Baseus PI LITE INDOOR CAMERA
ErMurazor
Updated:
Monday at 12:26 PM
Ad icon
Colombo
Hard Disk For Sale
mazza
Updated:
Oct 10, 2026
land for sale
justasking
Updated:
Oct 10, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
The Most Dangerous Weapon is NOT Nuclear
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="warwickuni" data-source="post: 28994068" data-attributes="member: 101444"><p>Analogy of Nuke is not appropriate for control though the danger is similar . Nukes do not replicate /proliferate on its own like DNA, and purification of Uranium to weapons grade is a time consuming costly matter compared to relatively easy genetic engineering . So it will never be possible to control genetic engineering the same way IAEA does to Radio Active Material. It is relatively easy to make a dirty bomb! But regulation of genetic engineering is better than wild west attitude specially by countries such as China. Difficult thing is to get them understand anything from Biotechnology to IDR! </p><p>Non proliferation of man made Dangerous organisms can never be successful due to difficulty in monitoring due to relative ease in alteration to DNA in organisms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="warwickuni, post: 28994068, member: 101444"] Analogy of Nuke is not appropriate for control though the danger is similar . Nukes do not replicate /proliferate on its own like DNA, and purification of Uranium to weapons grade is a time consuming costly matter compared to relatively easy genetic engineering . So it will never be possible to control genetic engineering the same way IAEA does to Radio Active Material. It is relatively easy to make a dirty bomb! But regulation of genetic engineering is better than wild west attitude specially by countries such as China. Difficult thing is to get them understand anything from Biotechnology to IDR! Non proliferation of man made Dangerous organisms can never be successful due to difficulty in monitoring due to relative ease in alteration to DNA in organisms. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Hath warak paha keeyada? (hatha wadikireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom