Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AncientGlory" data-source="post: 10683299" data-attributes="member: 262433">You misunderstand my point. To judge a person, a single fault is sufficient provided that he is guilty for the wrong he is accused for. If you say otherwise you must be living in some "Bizaro" world. According to the the laws in the normal world breaking a law single time is enough to punish him. And if he is not guilty he is not guilty, that is why there is a legal term called "Beyond reasonable doubt". So which begs the question is Prophet Muhammad guilty? But the interesting question is what is he accused of?Here is my accusation "Prophet Muhammad being a man of 54 married a girl of 6 and had sex with her at the age of 9 and continued to do so until he died". Did he do this? Yes or No?The anti Islamic thing is getting old. So whatever you wanna call me, is fine by me. It doesn't add anything to the discussion.How is that relevant? As mentioned many times, one time is enough to know.This means nothing. Can you bring proof to say that she did not disagree.How do you know he did not? We all know that according to his laws you can have sex with slaves. How many slaves did he have? How do you know?Also he could just not select a child in his other marriages but only select a child in one marriage. Still the allegations are true.How do you know?First how do you know? Then why would anyone want to criticize a man of militory power and risk getting killed?So where are the sources? Or are you suggesting that I should accept Zakir Naik's claim just because he says so in his site without any evidence to support the claim?</blockquote>

Verification: Winadiyakata thappara keeyak tibeda?

Top Bottom