Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AtulaSiriwardane" data-source="post: 4027741" data-attributes="member: 120286">9/11 truth? - NO STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE BUILDING HAS EVER COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE. <img src="http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/7416/wt7firesfy5.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> The following images were taken during and after the fire at the Madrid Windsor Tower, which burned at temperatures of 800 celcius and for over 18 hours (AFP). The core of this building did not fail and the building remained standing. <img src="http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3967/madridfiressd6.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> Below are images of a government building in Caracas, Venezuela which burned for 17 hours in October 2004. This building is Venezuela's highest skyscraper and suffered the destruction of the top twenty of its fifty floors yet the building still did not collapse. <img src="http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/7525/venezfiressmcl3.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> Yet, here are images of World Trade Centre 7, a 47 story steel framed building, which having suffered fires only on a few floors on September 11, 2001, collapsed symetrically at virtually free fall speed and neatly into its own footprint - achievable only using carefully placed explosives. Is it reasonable to ignore this unprecendented collapse because we cannot immediately answer the subsequent questions that this raises? Are we to just accept the commission's decision not to interview the company responsible for security, especially in light of the fact that the board included the brother of the President George W Bush, who himself was one of those that benefitted most from the attacks? </blockquote>

Verification: Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)

Top Bottom