US backs infrastructure scheme to rival China’s Belt and Road

Mayaratne

Well-known member
  • Nov 24, 2014
    3,509
    344
    83
    US backs infrastructure scheme to rival China’s Belt and Road​


    Blue Dot Network will vet and certify projects to promote ‘sustainable’ development.

    http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com%2F0391cbf0-fedd-11e9-a530-16c6c29e70ca

    The US is aiming to capitalise on growing unease in Asia about the risks and costs of China’s Belt and Road Initiative by unveiling a certification scheme that will set international standards for big infrastructure projects. 

    The American-led Blue Dot Network will, its organisers said on Monday, vet and certify projects to promote “market-driven, transparent, and financially sustainable” infrastructure development in Asia and around the world. 

    The Blue Dot Network — named after the astronomer Carl Sagan’s observation that Earth looked like a “pale blue dot” when viewed from space — will initially be led by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, in co-operation with the Japan Bank for International Cooperation and Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

    The plan was announced by OPIC, the US agency that promotes investment in emerging markets, at an American-sponsored Indo-Pacific Business Forum held alongside the south-east Asian regional grouping Asean’s annual leaders’ summit. 

    The organisers will form a steering committee to develop the plan, inviting other countries, private companies and civil society groups to join. 

    “Each blue dot is meant to be a dot on the map that will be a safe place for companies to operate if they are interested in sustainable infrastructure projects,” Wilbur Ross, the US commerce secretary, told the Financial Times ahead of the launch. “The point is to show seriousness about the sustainability of projects.” 

    The initiative follows criticism that some BRI projects — for example in Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and Laos — create debt traps for beneficiary countries or fail to meet international standards on transparency, local workers’ rights and environmental standards. 

    “The Marshall Plan showed what good development can be,” David Bohigian, the OPIC official who announced the initiative, told the FT, referring to America’s post-second world war aid programme in Europe. “The Belt and Road Initiative follows a path different from the Marshall Plan.” 

    However, it is unclear how effective the Washington-backed initiative will be at holding back unsustainable BRI developments. Blue Dot Network organisers claim the initiative will serve as a catalyst for private finance, but it will have no lending function of its own. BRI, in contrast, is underwritten by billions of dollars from Chinese state-owned banks and companies. 

    America’s role in Asia was in the spotlight at the Asean summit, where Mr Ross and Robert O’Brien, the national security adviser, led the US delegation. President Donald Trump’s decision not to attend was widely noted by regional press, and several south-east Asian leaders sent lower-ranking officials to an Asean-US summit on Monday in a move viewed by Washington as a snub. 

    When asked at a press briefing whether Mr Trump should have come, Carlos “Sonny” Dominguez III, the Philippine finance secretary, said: “That would be nice, but I suppose he has other issues to address, and most of them are domestic at the moment.” 

    According to the annual Asia Power Index published by the Sydney-based Lowy Institute, which measures countries’ influence on economic relationships, military capability and other partners, the US remains the pre-eminent overall power in Asia, but became a “net underachiever” in 2019 as China gained ground. 

    “The US remains an important, but not the primary economic player in Asia,” said Hervé Lemahieu, head of Lowy’s Asian Power and Diplomacy Programme, noting that China now outranked it on trade. “They’ve got to get used to that.” 


    -Source FT.Com
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Dr Sue

    Mayaratne

    Well-known member
  • Nov 24, 2014
    3,509
    344
    83
    China's 'Belt and Road' strategy has a new competitor — enter America's 'Blue Dot Network'

    11588408-3x2-700x467.jpg


    In a bid to provide an alternative to China's multi-billion-dollar Belt and Road infrastructure initiative, Washington has announced its 'Blue Dot Network' designed to fund infrastructure "sustainably".

    Key points:

    • The Blue Dot Network was jointly launched by the US, Japan and Australia
    • Its authors say it will act as a counterweight to China's Belt and Road infrastructure fundUS officials have likened it to a 'Michelin Guide' for Asian infrastructure investors
    • The plan's name is a reference to the late scientist Carl Sagan's book Pale Blue Dot and the photo of Earth taken by Voyager 1 from more than 6.4 billion kilometres away.

    In a bid to provide an alternative to China's multi-billion-dollar Belt and Road infrastructure initiative, Washington has announced its 'Blue Dot Network' designed to fund infrastructure "sustainably"

    The plan's name is a reference to the late scientist Carl Sagan's book Pale Blue Dot and the photo of Earth taken by Voyager 1 from more than 6.4 billion kilometres away.

    US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced the move — led by the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), and the Australian Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) — on the sidelines of the 35th Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) summit in Thailand on Tuesday.

    A statement on the OPIC website said the network was designed to bring the public and private sector together to "promote high-quality, trusted standards for global infrastructure development in an open and inclusive framework".