Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
Ad icon
Sell your Land, House on idamata.lk for FREE
sajith.xp.pk
Updated:
Yesterday at 9:03 AM
Handmade Character Soft Toys
anil1961
Updated:
Tuesday at 2:11 PM
Bodim.lk out now !
Manoj Suranga Bandara
Updated:
Sunday at 3:05 AM
Power Lifting Lever Belt
SkullVamp
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Ad icon
port.lk Domain for sale
Lankan-Tech
Updated:
Jun 13, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
General
ElaKiri Talk!
What Does IQ Actually Measure?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lovethebomb" data-source="post: 29104651" data-attributes="member: 531830"><p>On a different note, we all know that the topic of intelligence has become quite the hot potato. I think this aversion still persists due to a big mistake we do in terms how we view and value intelligence.</p><p></p><p>I think it’s a wrong move to regard intelligence as something ethereal or supreme to every other human trait, period. This is nothing new, even goes back to ancient societies where people thought being scholarly minded is more worthwhile than being physically strong or having a big genitalia, latter of which was considered uncouth or barbaric. True, there are situations where intelligence should be given the priority than physical apprehension but there’s no reason to do so <em>in general</em>.</p><p></p><p>We are biological systems. We know that certain ethnicities are better at discharging tremendous amounts of metabolic energy in a short period of time so they become better athletes, some ethnicities have crazy precise hand-eye coordination and they are better at tasks that require dexterity, certain ethnicities are good at analytical thinking so they excel at scholarly work—all of these are expressions of our biological existence. Nobody bats an eye when Africans are said to have superior physical strength and stamina, when East Asians kids win every piano and violin competition on earth but the moment intelligence is brought to the table we get touchy feely. Because we deep down think being intelligent is better than other biological traits which is objectively fallacious. We really should stop doing this. Being intelligent than others should not be a crime any more than being more athletic than others. Some people are better at problem solving, some are more susceptible to diseases, some are more physically fit—none of these people are better or worse at being human than others in general.</p><p></p><p>If we level the aforementioned hierarchy a bit I think intelligence discourse will have a more welcoming environment.</p><p></p><p></p><p>PS:</p><p>Having said all this, historically, we should blame the Nazis and American eugenists…they are the ones who spoiled this topic for everyone and made it more pernicious. At the wrong hands topic of intelligence could have disastrous social implications indeed and that threat should be avoided at all costs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lovethebomb, post: 29104651, member: 531830"] On a different note, we all know that the topic of intelligence has become quite the hot potato. I think this aversion still persists due to a big mistake we do in terms how we view and value intelligence. I think it’s a wrong move to regard intelligence as something ethereal or supreme to every other human trait, period. This is nothing new, even goes back to ancient societies where people thought being scholarly minded is more worthwhile than being physically strong or having a big genitalia, latter of which was considered uncouth or barbaric. True, there are situations where intelligence should be given the priority than physical apprehension but there’s no reason to do so [I]in general[/I]. We are biological systems. We know that certain ethnicities are better at discharging tremendous amounts of metabolic energy in a short period of time so they become better athletes, some ethnicities have crazy precise hand-eye coordination and they are better at tasks that require dexterity, certain ethnicities are good at analytical thinking so they excel at scholarly work—all of these are expressions of our biological existence. Nobody bats an eye when Africans are said to have superior physical strength and stamina, when East Asians kids win every piano and violin competition on earth but the moment intelligence is brought to the table we get touchy feely. Because we deep down think being intelligent is better than other biological traits which is objectively fallacious. We really should stop doing this. Being intelligent than others should not be a crime any more than being more athletic than others. Some people are better at problem solving, some are more susceptible to diseases, some are more physically fit—none of these people are better or worse at being human than others in general. If we level the aforementioned hierarchy a bit I think intelligence discourse will have a more welcoming environment. PS: Having said all this, historically, we should blame the Nazis and American eugenists…they are the ones who spoiled this topic for everyone and made it more pernicious. At the wrong hands topic of intelligence could have disastrous social implications indeed and that threat should be avoided at all costs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Haya warak paha keeyada? (haya wadi kireema paha)
Post reply
Top
Bottom