S0 better use it @ 1GB.But since you have 1GB try paging file off.Because in XP it tries to write to page file when pass the Around 483 MB of Physical RAM used mark.I would say give 512MB.Let the RAM do more.
If you use a pagefile, it should be enough to hold the entire content of the RAM. The generally accepted size is 1.5 times the size of physical RAM.zCexVe said:It is said to use twice as memory size for the page file.But never more than 1GBS0 better use it @ 1GB.But since you have 1GB try paging file off.Because in XP it tries to write to page file when pass the Around 483 MB of Physical RAM used mark.I would say give 512MB.Let the RAM do more.
![]()

But in general XP environment(SP2) you can clearly see that they page it off even though a large physical RAM amount(60%) is available right?When I had 1GB on I ran without paging and god it was great.Anusha said:If you use a pagefile, it should be enough to hold the entire content of the RAM. The generally accepted size is 1.5 times the size of physical RAM.
Do not be mistaken; pagefile is not there for increasing the amount of virtual memory. They is a much important use of it - memory defragmentation. Again not to be mistaken it as same as defragging the hard disk![]()
Now I have 512MB installed but to tell you paging starts @ around 300MB of physical RAM :S I am sure if you use 1.5 x as memory size it would be a disaster for sure.
zCexVe said:It is said to use twice as memory size for the page file.But never more than 1GBS0 better use it @ 1GB.But since you have 1GB try paging file off.Because in XP it tries to write to page file when pass the Around 483 MB of Physical RAM used mark.I would say give 512MB.Let the RAM do more.
![]()

Anusha said:If you use a pagefile, it should be enough to hold the entire content of the RAM. The generally accepted size is 1.5 times the size of physical RAM.
Do not be mistaken; pagefile is not there for increasing the amount of virtual memory. They is a much important use of it - memory defragmentation. Again not to be mistaken it as same as defragging the hard disk![]()
zCexVe said:But in general XP environment(SP2) you can clearly see that they page it off even though a large physical RAM amount(60%) is available right?When I had 1GB on I ran without paging and god it was great.Now I have 512MB installed but to tell you paging starts @ around 300MB of physical RAM :S I am sure if you use 1.5 x as memory size it would be a disaster for sure.
![]()
zCexVe said:It is said to use twice as memory size for the page file.But never more than 1GBS0 better use it @ 1GB.But since you have 1GB try paging file off.Because in XP it tries to write to page file when pass the Around 483 MB of Physical RAM used mark.I would say give 512MB.Let the RAM do more.
![]()


Well, you have to set a larger pagefile if the virtual memory requirement is high. That's different. I was talking for someone who use XP and has 1GB of RAM or more. 1.5GB pagefile for Vista wouldn't be enough. True that.zCexVe said:But in general XP environment(SP2) you can clearly see that they page it off even though a large physical RAM amount(60%) is available right?When I had 1GB on I ran without paging and god it was great.Now I have 512MB installed but to tell you paging starts @ around 300MB of physical RAM :S I am sure if you use 1.5 x as memory size it would be a disaster for sure.
![]()
I don't know about you, but when I was playing Crysis Warhead without a pagefile, apps running in background started to crash. When I checked, the RAM usage was 3.95GB in task manager!!! I had to enabled the pagefile straightaway!!! I was like OMG!!! It never happened in Crysis vanila though :/Clerk_Kent said:yep..
try disabling page file if u have enough ram amount...![]()