themera said:Yeap 69 is definitly not that bad wen we coempear the size of our land

themera said:Yeap 69 is definitly not that bad wen we coempear the size of our land
sld said:You guys are missing the point here. We shouldn't be proud of our expenditure... a small nation like ours doesn't have to have that big of a military budget. Hopefully we can get rid of the ltte dogs and use the money for the betterment of the country.

yeap srinadu wat ur saying is 100% true which menace that we have put a huge effort in to saving our contry and for a small country and a developing country v s/b quite hapee about it as u say some countries dont even have a n armysridanu said:yes i agree v hav 2 chase the dogs out 1st.
But i personaly belive that a countries military strength is a measurement of its prosperity.
Dont get me wrong im not saying military exoenditure is a gd thing. Im saying that the money shld b used for the betterment of the military as well as the ppl.
themera said:yeap srinadu wat ur saying is 100% true which menace that we have put a huge effort in to saving our contry and for a small country and a developing country v s/b quite hapee about it as u say some countries dont even have a n army
sridanu said:100% wit u on dat machan
sridanu said:But i personaly belive that a countries military strength is a measurement of its prosperity.
sld said:I thought it was how many hospitals, doctors, engineers a country has... how good the roads are... how good the trasportation, communication systems are... what the literacy rate is... how high the GDP is.
I kind of understand your saying about a country needing a strong military but look at our neighbours.... unless maldives or nepal decides to invade us, we can't stop anyone else. So I believe it's better to use the money to better the infrastucture of the country. then people can produce more and then we can think about spending more on the military. Just my two cents
Yeap man thts true lyk say if we did not have an army or had a very poor army we should have being hacked by the lttte dogssridanu said:Ahh mchan never underestimate the need for a military. Its not just abt raw military power its also abt military tactics.
Just a reminder that Sri Lanka once invaded the whole of South India a long long time ago. And i beliv that if we had a strong military we wldnt hav sucumbed 2 de english.
themera said:Yeap man thts true lyk say if we did not have an army or had a very poor army we should have being hacked by the lttte dogs

sridanu said:Ahh mchan never underestimate the need for a military. Its not just abt raw military power its also abt military tactics.
Just a reminder that Sri Lanka once invaded the whole of South India a long long time ago. And i beliv that if we had a strong military we wldnt hav sucumbed 2 de english.

yeah man we should heve more tactics too as u say i get ur whole point coz wen i went to jaffna in teh year 2003 one tiger said tht one l.t.t.e kills 10 of our men B4 they die and i wanmted to say some thing back but then i might have being under teh soil by nowsld said:My point exactly.. the tactics can't be developed by spending money on weapons. That comes from education and for that we need better schools and better teachers.
Well it was the technology and the bastard locals who supported the English that made us lose. They had guns and we didn't. And some of the locals betrayed the country. Just like some politician must be gatting a percentage of that 600 million wea re spending. Oh well.... can't kill them all![]()
themera said:yeah man we should heve more tactics too as u say i get ur whole point coz wen i went to jaffna in teh year 2003 one tiger said tht one l.t.t.e kills 10 of our men B4 they die and i wanmted to say some thing back but then i might have being under teh soil by now

dont think i ma lying dude i have got pics to prove itsld said:
that i went to jaffna