Which company is the most advance in the aspect of technology and performance?

[¤--bACarDi--¤]

No doubt its Advanced Micro Devices....

 

[Anusha]

But QPI cant beat HT

Actually, Intel's good old FSB didn't have to play hard ball with HTT either

Overclocking an AMD is confusing and boring than overclocking a Core 2 (imho). Same with Ci1. Sucks!

 

[fallenzeraphine]

AMD made the Hypertransport bus and they moved onto IMCs
That is what made Intel to implement QPI and a tri channel DDR3 MC on the core i7s, C2Q were bottlenecked by memory bandwith

Actually they were not bottlenecked by Memory Bandwidth, they were bottlenecked by the system BUS speed AKA FSB, DDR2 has More than enough Bandwidth for any application that we see today.

 

[fallenzeraphine]

About QuickPath and Hyper Transport, QP is a essentially a HT clone that has the same features (But Lacks the Speed), but its propitiatory and can only be used by Intel Hardware, HT on the other hand is a Open standard controlled by Hypertransport Consortium, and can be used on wide variety of hardware, and the technology is quite mature now (8 years), if u try to compair the speed HT wipe the slate clean with 51.2 GB/s Bi-Directional Bandwidth, compaired to 32GB/s Max of QuickPath, The reason some AMD processors are slower on HT than Core 2 on FSB is cecause of the Slower MicroArchtecture of the Early AMD processors (K8, K10). HT is Technically Superiror to QP in every way, thats why Lots of companies use HT for High Perforamnce computing including IBM on their Super Computer and Cisco with their Wide Range of Routers.

 

[roshant]

Intel can afford to reduce prices their products.But aint doing it.
Amd had a problem with durability of their products.Specially early Athlons.
For Gaming I recommend ATI at the moment.

 

[rudayas]

INTEL

 

[Intel_Nehalem]

Actually they were not bottlenecked by Memory Bandwidth, they were bottlenecked by the system BUS speed AKA FSB, DDR2 has More than enough Bandwidth for any application that we see today.

d'oh!

 

[gayannr]

lmao,, nVidia only 4 votes so far

 

[fallenzeraphine]

lmao,, nVidia only 4 votes so far

aww well most of the good things they have are Acquired from 3Dfx, now that was the most awesome GFX card company ever, nvidia is not a technology pioneer of sorts

 

[pradeeplk1025]

nVidia Den 3D Monitor ekak ekka Spectacle 1k denawa. Full 3G Experiance eka tamai! Eeka Actually 4D Kiyannath puluwan!........

 

[gayannr]

nVidia Den 3D Monitor ekak ekka Spectacle 1k denawa. Full 3G Experiance eka tamai! Eeka Actually 4D Kiyannath puluwan!........

dan hamotama 3D,3G patalenawa neda

 

[fallenzeraphine]

nVidia Den 3D Monitor ekak ekka Spectacle 1k denawa. Full 3G Experiance eka tamai! Eeka Actually 4D Kiyannath puluwan!........

Mate its not a 3D monitor its a Samsung High Refreshrate LCD (120Hz) to go with the 3D glasses.

 

[kasunsankalpana]

Man nam hithanne Intel

 

[GNS]

I think AMD going for new things too soon is their downfall. Intel is cunning, and wise, they wait and see what happens to the rival. even core 2 was created after the dothan chip proved to be excellent.

that's why they named their processors to mislead buyers

Core2™ & Pentium DualCore™ etc

 

[Anusha]

that's why they named their processors to mislead buyers

Core2™ & Pentium DualCore™ etc

actually i think AMD did that. Core i7 940 vs. Phenom II 940
naming Core 2 grade CPUs as Pentium Dual Core was a mistake imo. People mistake it for the old PentiumD CPUs.