Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
New posts
All threads
Latest threads
New posts
Trending threads
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New ads
New profile posts
Latest activity
Free Ads
Latest reviews
Search ads
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Contact us
Latest ads
හොඳ, දැන්වීම්-රහිත (ad-free) ආයුර්වේද ඇප් එකක් සොයා ගැනීමට නොහැකි වූ නිසා, මමම එකක් නිර්මාණය කළා
kitchen_discussions
Updated:
Yesterday at 2:34 AM
Ad icon
Iptv
musicking
Updated:
Sunday at 9:52 AM
Ad icon
ZTE MF283U 4G Unlocked Router (Used)
ayanthamaxi
Updated:
Jul 19, 2026
ලංකාවේ හොඳම උපකාරක පන්ති සහ ගුරුවරුන් එකම තැනකින් - TopTuition.lk
dulithapathum
Updated:
Jul 18, 2026
Colombo
RidhMathraa ’26 🎶✨
Tmadhusanka
Updated:
Jul 15, 2026
Electronics
Vehicles
Property
Search
Reply to thread
Forums
Computers & Internet
News & Discussion
Which company is the most advance in the aspect of technology and performance?
Get the App
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fallenzeraphine" data-source="post: 3923747" data-attributes="member: 76400"><p>About QuickPath and Hyper Transport, QP is a essentially a HT clone that has the same features (But Lacks the Speed), but its propitiatory and can only be used by Intel Hardware, HT on the other hand is a Open standard controlled by Hypertransport Consortium, and can be used on wide variety of hardware, and the technology is quite mature now (8 years), if u try to compair the speed HT wipe the slate clean with 51.2 GB/s Bi-Directional Bandwidth, compaired to 32GB/s Max of QuickPath, The reason some AMD processors are slower on HT than Core 2 on FSB is cecause of the Slower MicroArchtecture of the Early AMD processors (K8, K10). HT is Technically Superiror to QP in every way, thats why Lots of companies use HT for High Perforamnce computing including IBM on their Super Computer and Cisco with their Wide Range of Routers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fallenzeraphine, post: 3923747, member: 76400"] About QuickPath and Hyper Transport, QP is a essentially a HT clone that has the same features (But Lacks the Speed), but its propitiatory and can only be used by Intel Hardware, HT on the other hand is a Open standard controlled by Hypertransport Consortium, and can be used on wide variety of hardware, and the technology is quite mature now (8 years), if u try to compair the speed HT wipe the slate clean with 51.2 GB/s Bi-Directional Bandwidth, compaired to 32GB/s Max of QuickPath, The reason some AMD processors are slower on HT than Core 2 on FSB is cecause of the Slower MicroArchtecture of the Early AMD processors (K8, K10). HT is Technically Superiror to QP in every way, thats why Lots of companies use HT for High Perforamnce computing including IBM on their Super Computer and Cisco with their Wide Range of Routers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Nawa warak dahaya keeyada? (Namaya wadi kireema dahaya)
Post reply
Top
Bottom