Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="x-pert" data-source="post: 4211071" data-attributes="member: 837">Sorry if you misunderstood. I didn't mean the field doctor who was there that day was responsible. That would be insane, because he is just doing his duty. I was actually referring the doctors who check the quality of the medicine after importing (If there's any) So basically you are agreeing with my conclusion. <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Doctors who are testing the medicine ("drug monitoring authority" in your words) are responsible.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Government is responsible ("deaf ears" in your words)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">And the people who are producing the vaccine are responsible.</li> </ul>True, Authorities should ban importations from that Indian company. At least there won't be incidents like this in the future then [hopefully] But what if, if it's a rare situation (due to that girl's gene structure or whatever) only that girl is allergic to that substance? Then everybody will do their work freely again right? I mean if Government really wants to have that Indian supplier for future deals, it's not really hard to cook up a scheme like that right? Especially with a backbone-less administration?</blockquote>

Top Bottom