Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="thirucumaran" data-source="post: 465433" data-attributes="member: 4655">Frankly, what 'iroshan_464' is saying is quite wrong, because we marginally lost to South Africa, which shows that we can still pull out a victory from the jaws of death, and the fact that we lost to Australia was solely because Murali, Vaas and Malinga did not play! Australia have never played Mali in a ODI match, which means that he would have taken a minimum of 3 wickets in that match. Some of you might say that they would practice against Shaun Tait, but his bowling action isn't necessarily a round - arm action. His one is a mixture of round - arm and under - arm, whereas Malinga has a pure round - arm action, which gives him extra speed and control. Murali has increased his armoury such as bowling the doosra from around the wicket, and the Aussies have never faced such a ball from Murali, which also raises the question as to whether they would have tackled that ball properly! So, Mr. Coolboy, please think about any matter before you post it!LET THE LIONS ROAR IN THE FINALS AND TEAR APART THE KANGAROOS!</blockquote>

Top Bottom