Latest ads

Baseus PI LITE INDOOR CAMERA
- ErMurazor
- Updated: Today at 12:26 PM
Ad icon
Colombo Hard Disk For Sale
- mazza
- Updated: Saturday at 10:23 PM
land for sale
- justasking
- Updated: Saturday at 9:32 AM
AMD AM 5 Ryzen setup
- prabodhamadusanka
- Updated: Thursday at 12:56 PM
Gampaha ACER OKW223 Wired RGB Keyboard
- chint
- Updated: Thursday at 10:17 AM

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I love Srilanka" data-source="post: 7720270" data-attributes="member: 244944">for your question it required me to put full history back ground. what u mean by my opinion,u never asked my opinion of any, but you surely had put some question as below, I really wonder,by looking your reply,that you were not looking for the answer as i provided though you asked some question which have to be replied in the context of history, even you had asked me in which way I reply u either in the history or general terms .have u read my answers? if you are not satisfied still,Now what is your question? and in which way u expect my answer. (1) Why do you think ordaining fighting(Regardless its defensive or offensive) is not promoting violence? (2) Where did you find the word defend? Where is the defensive act mentioned?(3) What do you mean by right of "others"? Who are "others"?What is the oppression and injustice you are talking about here? Is there a historical story to it? Or you are talking in general terms. Do you consider not allowing someone to worship their own religion as oppression and injustice?(Look below verse)"Quran 2:217 > "They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for persecution is worse than killing."</blockquote>

Verification: Awruddata maasa keeyada?

Top Bottom