WPrime 32M Benchmark !

ruc

Member
Apr 22, 2007
183
0
0
Anusha said:
But we are not talking about server CPUs here.

:shocked: Why...? Servers are the most speedest Computers on earth....
Desktops are Babies neh...? Thatz why im tawkin abt them..:confused:
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
ruc said:
:shocked: Why...? Servers are the most speedest Computers on earth....
Desktops are Babies neh...? Thatz why im tawkin abt them..:confused:
They are not faster the desktop CPUs. But they can work together with a lot of other CPUs and that multiprocessing is what makes them faster! If you take a single CPU, they are not much faster than Desktop CPUs, sometimes slower than desktop CPUs.
 

ruc

Member
Apr 22, 2007
183
0
0
Anusha said:
They are not faster the desktop CPUs. But they can work together with a lot of other CPUs and that multiprocessing is what makes them faster! If you take a single CPU, they are not much faster than Desktop CPUs, sometimes slower than desktop CPUs.

:shocked: :shocked:Hapoi meka mokak hari kiyanawane....
Machan ehenam me Single CPU Server board ekata Xeon demme ei...Core 2 Extream daana thibbane....Single CPU hinda multiproccesing nene...:yes:

1999_l.jpg


"Server is also used as a designation for computer models intended for use in running server applications under heavy workloads, also called operating units often unattended and for an extended period of time. While any workstation computer is capable of acting as a server, a server computer usually has special features intended to make it more suitable. These features can include a faster CPU, faster and more plentiful RAM, and larger hard drives. More obvious distinctions include redundancy in power supplies, network connections, and storage devices as well as the modular design of so-called Blade servers often used in server farms."

kiyala wedak ne...
 

fallenzeraphine

Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    The simple facts are these, Core 2 Architecture is almost always faster in general purpose computing than the K8 Architecture Athlon X2 based on. Super PI tends to Favor Intel Processors (Even the new Phenom II lags behind in super pi than Conroes and Penryns but Phenom II is much faster with general purpose applications) for some reason hence its not a good test to see which processor is better, wprime on the other hand favors AMD chips, the reason for this favorability is the Algorithms these programs use to calculate the Prime numbers or the value of Pi, they only use some parts of the Processor. If you really want to see how many calculations ur processor can do you should run Linpack in 64 bit mode, itll give you the most accurate performance number in GigaFlops. so in General

    Netburst < K8 < Conroe < Penryn < *Shanghai < Nehalem

    *
    this is inconclusive as of yet

    So no matter what you see on Synthetic Benchmarks This is the way it is.
     
    Last edited:

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    ruc said:
    :shocked: :shocked:Hapoi meka mokak hari kiyanawane....
    Machan ehenam me Single CPU Server board ekata Xeon demme ei...Core 2 Extream daana thibbane....Single CPU hinda multiproccesing nene...:yes:


    "Server is also used as a designation for computer models intended for use in running server applications under heavy workloads, also called operating units often unattended and for an extended period of time. While any workstation computer is capable of acting as a server, a server computer usually has special features intended to make it more suitable. These features can include a faster CPU, faster and more plentiful RAM, and larger hard drives. More obvious distinctions include redundancy in power supplies, network connections, and storage devices as well as the modular design of so-called Blade servers often used in server farms."

    kiyala wedak ne...
    You have no Idea what you are talking about man, Anusha is completely correct, Server Processors are Always based on the Desktop counterparts (with Intel and AMD) server processors are made to last, they come out from really good Batches of Silicon, they have multiple data connection paths as Anusha said so they can be interconnected with several other CPU's, and because of that they use a different CPU socket, so u nit wit the reason they used a Xeon here is you simply cant stick a Core 2 extreme in it, plus a normal desktop CPU might not be reliable enough for the purpose server is built for, servers are highly specialized hardware and they are not intended for general purpose computing, so you Cant compare a server to a Desktop PC, I hope I got through to ur silly head.
     
    Last edited:

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    ruc said:
    :shocked: :shocked:Hapoi meka mokak hari kiyanawane....
    Machan ehenam me Single CPU Server board ekata Xeon demme ei...Core 2 Extream daana thibbane....Single CPU hinda multiproccesing nene...:yes:

    1999_l.jpg


    "Server is also used as a designation for computer models intended for use in running server applications under heavy workloads, also called operating units often unattended and for an extended period of time. While any workstation computer is capable of acting as a server, a server computer usually has special features intended to make it more suitable. These features can include a faster CPU, faster and more plentiful RAM, and larger hard drives. More obvious distinctions include redundancy in power supplies, network connections, and storage devices as well as the modular design of so-called Blade servers often used in server farms."

    kiyala wedak ne...
    Reliability maybe.

    They have to use ECC RAM on these boards. Of course a similar desktop CPU will do the same work, and quite possibly be as reliable as the server CPU, BUT Intel wouldn't allow that because then they can't make money :P
     

    kamalmawa

    Member
    Sep 9, 2008
    574
    1
    0
    Melbourne
    fallenzeraphine said:
    The simple facts are these, Core 2 Architecture is almost always faster in general purpose computing than the K8 Architecture Athlon X2 based on. Super PI tends to Favor Intel Processors (Even the new Phenom II lags behind in super pi than Conroes and Penryns but Phenom II is much faster with general purpose applications) for some reason hence its not a good test to see which processor is better, wprime on the other hand favors AMD chips, the reason for this favorability is the Algorithms these programs use to calculate the Prime numbers or the value of Pi, they only use some parts of the Processor. If you really want to see how many calculations ur processor can do you should run Linpack in 64 bit mode, itll give you the most accurate performance number in GigaFlops. so in General

    Netburst < K8 < Conroe < Penryn < *Shanghai < Nehalem

    *
    this is inconclusive as of yet

    So no matter what you see on Synthetic Benchmarks This is the way it is.

    So u saying this benchmark is a bullshit because you don't like the results it's gave for AMD's... LOL:D
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    sri_lion said:
    Yako meke algorithm benchmarking threads start karana ewunta hena wadinawa da?:lol:

    Ko meh Thenuraya? :oo:
    :lol:

    Eeka Nuwara Eliye gihin kiyala MSN eke "ujaaruwata" daala thiyenne :P

    First time da manda :rofl:
     

    fallenzeraphine

    Active member
  • Jan 29, 2008
    1,385
    9
    38
    kamalmawa said:
    So u saying this benchmark is a bullshit because you don't like the results it's gave for AMD's... LOL:D
    Yes thats exactly what im saying smartass, and thats exactly why super Pi is bullshit cuz it always favors intel.
     

    kamalmawa

    Member
    Sep 9, 2008
    574
    1
    0
    Melbourne
    fallenzeraphine said:
    Yes thats exactly what im saying smartass, and thats exactly why super Pi is bullshit cuz it always favors intel.

    So did u tested the program by your self ? You must be so good at assembly language etc.. So are u working at a special Hardware lab too? :lol:
     

    ruchira88

    Well-known member
  • May 16, 2008
    5,157
    917
    113
    Haha here hero comes!

    my specs= Intel Q6600 @3061Mhz
    Intel DG33FBC
    Kingston 1GB 800Mhz @ 1000Mhz
    Windows Vista Home premium 64bit

    running EIST enabled :P:P

    w8h9en425s3uxp79fylm.jpg

     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    OMG! You are running Vista (x64??? :shocked) with 1GB RAM :shocked: :shocked:

    I can't imagine how slow it should be :P
     

    Anusha

    Member
    Jun 13, 2006
    25,864
    5
    0
    ruchira88 said:
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: check out my benchies!!:P:P:P:rofl:
    It doesn't matter what the CPU can do, if it is not responsive :P

    And whatever you say, Vista is hell without 2GB RAM. Meh! Even 2GB -> 4GB gives a significant boost in responsiveness.