Sri Lanka is not a Buddhist country

ibnanv

Well-known member
  • Jun 27, 2009
    3,986
    257
    83
    The Sri lankan constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Anuradhapura is not Buddhist. It is Sri Lankan. When British invaded this land and left it to all .Buddhist lost all things. Sri Lanka does not belong to the Racist Buddhist. Live and let live if you want to live pecefully. If unauthorized structures has to be destroyed then most of Buddhist temples should go with it. Which is blocking all road development. It is unconstitutional to fund one religion over other. This if free land . Any one should be able to worship any thing . No Place of worship should be destroyed.
     
    Last edited:

    e-marakkala

    Banned
    Nov 11, 2010
    310
    10
    0
    The Sri lankan constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Anuradhapura is not Buddhist. It is Sri Lankan. When British invaded this land and left it to all .Buddhist lost all things. Sri Lanka does not belong to the Racist Buddhist. Live and let live if you want to live pecefully. If unauthorized structures has to be destroyed then most of Buddhist temples should go with it. Which is blocking all road development. It is unconstitutional to fund one religion over other. This if free land . Any one should be able to worship any thing . No Place of worship should be destroyed.

    yes you're right brother. i agree with your point :)