A reduced cutoff mark has been allocated for some districts for university entrance. It was perceived that the reason behind this is, these districts should produce at least few of the professionals of the given study stream.
However, if majority of them get settled soon after graduation, the objective of this program is lost. (and creating an injustice to more competitive districts)
Some proposed to implement to sign a bond on university entrance, who got selected with relatively low marks, guaranteeing that he or she will serve their original district for a reasonable period after graduation.
Extreme cases may be considered case by case and could be released from the bond.
What's your opinion.
However, if majority of them get settled soon after graduation, the objective of this program is lost. (and creating an injustice to more competitive districts)
Some proposed to implement to sign a bond on university entrance, who got selected with relatively low marks, guaranteeing that he or she will serve their original district for a reasonable period after graduation.
Extreme cases may be considered case by case and could be released from the bond.
What's your opinion.