BREAKING: Iran threatens to attack White House

Sams.Ryo

Well-known member
  • Dec 7, 2014
    2,549
    974
    113
    31
    Colombo
    US military announced its suspending anti-ISIS operations in Iraq. Iraq parliament requests govt to kick out US forces. Massive protests in Iran. North Korea says it will show off new military technology soon. All have knock-on effects. More danger. More instability.
     

    Sams.Ryo

    Well-known member
  • Dec 7, 2014
    2,549
    974
    113
    31
    Colombo
    ENi4ustVAAAojig
     

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    12,405
    13,993
    113
    so how it calculate? don't talk about things you don't know dumb ass they calculate by satellite data its not 1000 KM its going to be only 300KM aria it will take max 10min to hit after launch so how can 30knot shop move away form it?:rofl::rofl::rofl:


    OMG at least read before you post fool there is no no mention there about they accelerating the ship while landing?. you think air craft carriers are very small they can accelerate so fast for plane to land?:rofl::rofl::rofl:



    No, not always. The Air Boss tells the Officer of the Deck what wind speed he wants and the ship travels at whatever speed is needed to get that wind over the deck. The highest desired speed is normally at the beginning of the cycle, when the heaviest planes are taking off. In my era that was normally fully-loaded A-6 Intruders needing 27 knots of wind, 10 degrees to port. Once they were gone the Boss would tell us to slow, typically to ~25 knots wind over deck.




    ballistic flight path is always the same you dumb fuck :rofl: ballistic missile can't guid itself to a moving target at it's terminal phase like a cruise missile :lol: You think a warship can't change it's course in 10 minutes? :rofl:

    Carriers don't suddenly accelerate when an aircraft is coming to land you dumbo :rofl: They just maintain a high speed during air operations :lol: you are the fool who said that they stop to launch plains :rofl:

    :lol::lol::lol: idiot carrier don't move all the time they stop to launch there aircrafts lol do you think ballistic missile is a toy of some kind take hours to reach the target?.:lol::lol::lol: when they launch it will take time to assess the target it going to hit and aircraft carrier s are so fast they can out accelerate a missile with 30 knots.:lol::lol::lol: and they don't need time to accelerate to top speed?.

    Anything to say dumb fuck?:rofl:
     

    LazyLizard

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2015
    59,445
    14,448
    113
    10
    කටුකරෝලගම
    :rofl::rofl: Iran ewunta mole tiyenawa. US ekka kelin happenna ba mokaata unath. okun passe strategically wate inna US allies walata podi podi seen dayi.
    අවුරුද්දක් විතර ගිහින් ට්‍රම්ප් ගොයියත් ජනාධිපතිකමේ නැති කාලයක් බලල පලවෙනි සංවත්සරේ වගේ අල්ලලා පොඩි මල් වෙඩිල්ලක් පත්තු කරයි :P
     

    LazyLizard

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2015
    59,445
    14,448
    113
    10
    කටුකරෝලගම
    :rofl: මේ මූ බලාගෙන ඉන්නෙ අරුන් දෙගොල්ලො කෙලවගන්නකම් :angry:
    එහෙම පොඩි කාලකන්නි මෙව්වා එකක් තියෙනවා ඉතිං :P

    ඒ උනාට මිනිස්සු මැරෙන වැඩක් හින්ද අවංකවම යුද්දයක් ඇති නොවේවා කියල ප්‍රාර්ථනා කරමු :yes:
     

    ramishka

    Active member
  • Feb 11, 2007
    441
    189
    43
    :lol::lol::lol: mu htihagana inne ballistic missile kiyanne bus ekak wage speed thiyana missile ekak kiyala paya gank yanawa kiyala hithanne target ekata yanna.:lol::lol::lol:

    I don't see why you laugh at this? If it's an Inter Continental Ballistic Missile (aka ICBM), it could take up to 30 mins depending on the launch of location.

    Assume the scenario a warhead was launched by Russia against a US carrier group. This would immediately be detected by USSTRATCOM and it would calculate the trajectory and identify it's been launched one of its aircraft carriers. It would warn the carrier to move away from the target position. Depending on the max speed of the carrier and the location of the launch, the carrier will likely be able to escape the explosion radius.

    To ensure a 100% hit chance and to take out a carrier group using an ICBM, it is theoretically suggested that it would take 6-7 ICMBs. 6-7 missiles would be simultaneously fired so that it covers all possible escape trajectories of the carrier.

    Another theoretical method is for someone to have eyes on the carrier as it moves, and feed the ICBM mid-course correction coordinates. Currently no country in the world posses such technology to do this with ICBMs.

    Also do not forget that usually ICBMs have an error probability rating (CEP or circular error probability). If the missile has a CEP of 1, that means it would hit the target within a 1 mile radius.

    Taking all of these into account, it is highly unlikely and downright insane for any country to use an ICBM to take down a carrier group. They are for strategic targets that span a large area like cities.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: thinking_guy

    Edward Kenway

    Well-known member
  • Jan 8, 2015
    12,405
    13,993
    113
    I don't see why you laugh at this? If it's an Inter Continental Ballistic Missile (aka ICBM), it could take up to 30 mins depending on the launch of location.

    Assume the scenario a warhead was launched by Russia against a US carrier group. This would immediately be detected by USSTRATCOM and it would calculate the trajectory and identify it's been launched one of its aircraft carriers. It would warn the carrier to move away from the target position. Depending on the max speed of the carrier and the location of the launch, the carrier will likely be able to escape the explosion radius.

    To ensure a 100% hit chance and to take out a carrier group using an ICBM, it is theoretically suggested that it would take 6-7 ICMBs. 6-7 missiles would be simultaneously fired so that it covers all possible escape trajectories of the carrier.

    Another theoretical method is for someone to have eyes on the carrier as it moves, and feed the ICBM mid-course correction coordinates. Currently no country in the world posses such technology to do this with ICBMs.

    Also do not forget that usually ICBMs have an error probability rating (CEP or circular error probability). If the missile has a CEP of 1, that means it would hit the target within a 1 mile radius.

    Taking all of these into account, it is highly unlikely and downright insane for any country to use an ICBM to take down a carrier group. They are for strategic targets that span a large area like cities.

    This idiot does not understand the "ballistic" nature of the ballistic missile :rofl:
     

    asylum

    Well-known member
  • Sep 25, 2013
    39,551
    1
    31,693
    113
    කැමති තැනක
    I don't see why you laugh at this? If it's an Inter Continental Ballistic Missile (aka ICBM), it could take up to 30 mins depending on the launch of location.

    Assume the scenario a warhead was launched by Russia against a US carrier group. This would immediately be detected by USSTRATCOM and it would calculate the trajectory and identify it's been launched one of its aircraft carriers. It would warn the carrier to move away from the target position. Depending on the max speed of the carrier and the location of the launch, the carrier will likely be able to escape the explosion radius.

    To ensure a 100% hit chance and to take out a carrier group using an ICBM, it is theoretically suggested that it would take 6-7 ICMBs. 6-7 missiles would be simultaneously fired so that it covers all possible escape trajectories of the carrier.

    Another theoretical method is for someone to have eyes on the carrier as it moves, and feed the ICBM mid-course correction coordinates. Currently no country in the world posses such technology to do this with ICBMs.

    Also do not forget that usually ICBMs have an error probability rating (CEP or circular error probability). If the missile has a CEP of 1, that means it would hit the target within a 1 mile radius.

    Taking all of these into account, it is highly unlikely and downright insane for any country to use an ICBM to take down a carrier group. They are for strategic targets that span a large area like cities.

    iran have only ballistic missiles they don't have any other that can even reach a carrier in sea and if you know the path that carrier moving you can launch missile at it if its going to hit or no is a another story if iran want to try to sink US carrier they will try there ballistic missile if it even reach carrier the missile will get shot down by defenses.


    BTW how is syrian and US war going?:lol::lol::lol:


    see this and then talk.:rofl::rofl::rofl:


    your butt buddy/account cant understand this so he argue with me like a stupid idiot.


    again why you want to speak for edward kenway/fake pons are you his butt buddy? or he just spine less for speak for him self.:rofl::rofl::rofl:
     
    Last edited:

    ramishka

    Active member
  • Feb 11, 2007
    441
    189
    43
    see this and then talk.:rofl::rofl::rofl:


    your but buddy/account cant understand this so he argue with me like a stupid idiot.


    again why you want to speak for edward kenway/fake pons are you his butt buddy? or he just spine less for speak for him self.:rofl::rofl::rofl:

    Well I didn't speak for anyone. If you think everyone who has a different opinion than you is someones fake account, then you've got issues. And if you have doubts if I'm a fake account or not, I'm on Elakiri under my real name. Anyone can Google and find out who I am. If I was scared of some 5 year old fucktards on an online forum, I wouldn't have used my real credentials here.

    Some of the stuff you have said on this thread (and the other one before) are downright wrong and misleading. And when pointed out, you never know how to present a constructive argument with facts but resort to the same name calling bullshit.

    Why I commented on your threads is because you state BULLSHIT as fact, and it misleads a lot of people here.
    You also try to humiliate others for their lack of knowledge while you yourself only know very little about the topics you claim to be an expert of.
     
    Last edited:

    asylum

    Well-known member
  • Sep 25, 2013
    39,551
    1
    31,693
    113
    කැමති තැනක
    Well I didn't speak for anyone. If you think everyone who has a different opinion than you is someones fake account, then you've got issues. And if you have doubts if I'm a fake account or not, I'm on Elakiri under my real name. Anyone can Google and find out who I am. If I was scared of some 5 year old fucktards on an online forum, I wouldn't have used my real credentials here.

    Some of the stuff you have said on this thread (and the other one before) are downright wrong and misleading. And when pointed out, you never know how to present a constructive argument with facts but resort to the same name calling bullshit.

    Why I commented on your threads is because you state BULLSHIT as fact, and it misleads a lot of people here.
    You also try to humiliate others for their lack of knowledge while you yourself only know very little about the topics you claim to be an expert of.


    :rofl::rofl::rofl: dude i didn't say you are fake but you butt buddy is fake account he cant come from his other account so he using this and we know what he done in EK so he will get that kind of response form others. and how you can know my age?. just ask your mother abut me she knows.:rofl::rofl::rofl:
    you just there to defend your friend when he is trouble you just comment on that thread after how long you stop and start posting on EK?.:rofl::rofl::rofl:


    if im wrong why not post a thread abut it to help other members instead why argue like a little bitch all the time if you don't like what i posting you can ignore me there is a option for that.:rofl::rofl::rofl: again you just shows you are all talk no show guy.


    why not at least be useful and post a thread about modern warfare or just want to argue abut things just you say right wont make you right you are the one full of bull shit buddy if you are so knowledgeable abut them just post a thread to others to see you are not doing it because you know you are full of shit.:rofl::rofl::rofl:

    and btw i never say i was a expert about them but you are the one with all the knowledge and expert here so why not show them?:rofl::rofl::rofl:



    i was trying to be nice to you but that wont work with a whore son like you just post a thread about them or you can GTFO and keep you opinion to your self bitch.
     
    Last edited: