Oxford Vaccine - Preliminary Analysis - Puzzling results

imhotep

Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,829
    8
    35,348
    113
    Te preliminary results announced yesterday showed that one regimen had an efficacy of 90% when the drug was given as a half dose, followed by a full dose at least one month apart.
    A second regimen showed 62% efficacy when given as two full doses at least one month apart. The combined analysis from both dosing regimens showed an average efficacy of 70% .

    So they will need a rethink on their dosing amounts. Several independent researchers commented that it's plausible to have different responses due to what's termed as "prime-boost phenomenon," which may be more common among vaccines that use viral vector technology. Hildegund Ertl, a viral immunologist at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, says results make sense in the light of some of her work on adenovirus vaccines in mice. She, too, has found that a low first dose can lead to better protection than a higher first dose in a two-dose vaccine. She thinks this is because a lower first dose leads more quickly to the establishment of ‘memory’ immune cells that are triggered by a second-dose boost. Waiting longer between the two doses could achieve the same effect.
    Also a similar phenomenon was noted during the tests of a trial vaccine for Ebola where they used the same technique but using a livestock virus.

    On the bright side this vaccine is quite stable at standard fridge temperatures for six months and hence storage and distribution is much easier than the the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. Also the cost is far less compared with other vaccines - being around 3 £. This is because they have a "No Profit" pledge "for the duration of the pandemic."
     

    Sri_Sampath

    Well-known member
  • Jan 26, 2010
    14,715
    12,746
    113
    ඔය 90% හොදයි කියන එක හදල තියෙන්නේ කොහොමද
    100 කට දුන්නොත් දහදෙනෙකුට හැදෙනවා කියන එකද
    90 කට සුවර් එකටම කොච්චර කලත් අවුරුද්දක් ගියත් හැදෙන්නේ නෑ කියන එකද

    ඕකේ data නම් දැක්කේ නෑ කොහෙවත්
     

    Garrus

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2015
    5,652
    967
    113
    නෝර්මැන්ඩි SR2
    ඔය 90% හොදයි කියන එක හදල තියෙන්නේ කොහොමද
    100 කට දුන්නොත් දහදෙනෙකුට හැදෙනවා කියන එකද
    90 කට සුවර් එකටම කොච්චර කලත් අවුරුද්දක් ගියත් හැදෙන්නේ නෑ කියන එකද

    ඕකේ data නම් දැක්කේ නෑ කොහෙවත්

    90% හැදෙන්නේ නැත්තම් තව කෙනෙක්ගෙන් බෝ වෙන්න තියෙන චාන්ස් එක අඩුයිනේ.. නිකම්ම වයිරස් එක නැති වෙලා යනවා ඇති..
     

    Sri_Sampath

    Well-known member
  • Jan 26, 2010
    14,715
    12,746
    113
    90% හැදෙන්නේ නැත්තම් තව කෙනෙක්ගෙන් බෝ වෙන්න තියෙන චාන්ස් එක අඩුයිනේ.. නිකම්ම වයිරස් එක නැති වෙලා යනවා ඇති..

    එහම අපිට කැමති දෙයක් හිතාගන්න කියල උන්ට ඕව suggest කරන්න බෑ
    මේ වගේ පැහැදිලිව මොනවා හරි ටිකක් කියන්න ඕනි
    නැත්තම් කොහොමත් ඕවට approval හම්බෙන්නේ නෑ
    නිකන් marketing විතරයි

    ගොඩක් වෙලාවට stocks විකුණගන්න වගේ දෙයක් වෙන්න පුළුවන් මට හිතෙන්නේ



    nejmoa0803259_t1.jpeg
     

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,829
    8
    35,348
    113
    ඔය 90% හොදයි කියන එක හදල තියෙන්නේ කොහොමද
    100 කට දුන්නොත් දහදෙනෙකුට හැදෙනවා කියන එකද
    90 කට සුවර් එකටම කොච්චර කලත් අවුරුද්දක් ගියත් හැදෙන්නේ නෑ කියන එකද

    ඕකේ data නම් දැක්කේ නෑ කොහෙවත්


    The term ‘efficacy’ is used when a study is carried out under ideal conditions, for example, during a clinical trial.
    Vaccine effectiveness is used under field conditions (ie: less than perfectly controlled)

    Vaccine efficacy is calculated by comparing the percent reduction in cases in the vaccine arm of the trial versus the control arm.
    The formula used is:
    (Percent of infected in control group – percent of infected in vaccinated group) / percent of infected in control group

    Please refer to AZ Press release. At the moment no other data has been published, but in the days to come more details will surface.

    https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/azd1222hlr.html
     
    • Love
    Reactions: Sri_Sampath

    Garrus

    Well-known member
  • Aug 27, 2015
    5,652
    967
    113
    නෝර්මැන්ඩි SR2
    එහම අපිට කැමති දෙයක් හිතාගන්න කියල උන්ට ඕව suggest කරන්න බෑ
    මේ වගේ පැහැදිලිව මොනවා හරි ටිකක් කියන්න ඕනි
    නැත්තම් කොහොමත් ඕවට approval හම්බෙන්නේ නෑ
    නිකන් marketing විතරයි

    ගොඩක් වෙලාවට stocks විකුණගන්න වගේ දෙයක් වෙන්න පුළුවන් මට හිතෙන්නේ



    nejmoa0803259_t1.jpeg

    තාම ඕක non-profit කියලා දාලා තියෙන්නෙ? ස්ටොක් විකුනුවට ලාබයක් නෑනේ..
     

    Pinkbc

    Well-known member
  • Nov 14, 2017
    1,072
    960
    113
    Te preliminary results announced yesterday showed that one regimen had an efficacy of 90% when the drug was given as a half dose, followed by a full dose at least one month apart.
    A second regimen showed 62% efficacy when given as two full doses at least one month apart. The combined analysis from both dosing regimens showed an average efficacy of 70% .

    So they will need a rethink on their dosing amounts. Several independent researchers commented that it's plausible to have different responses due to what's termed as "prime-boost phenomenon," which may be more common among vaccines that use viral vector

    prime-boost phenomenon :- I think this is same principle that vets using when vaccinating Dogs in first time right?
     

    Sri_Sampath

    Well-known member
  • Jan 26, 2010
    14,715
    12,746
    113
    The term ‘efficacy’ is used when a study is carried out under ideal conditions, for example, during a clinical trial.
    Vaccine effectiveness is used under field conditions (ie: less than perfectly controlled)

    Vaccine efficacy is calculated by comparing the percent reduction in cases in the vaccine arm of the trial versus the control arm.
    The formula used is:
    (Percent of infected in control group – percent of infected in vaccinated group) / percent of infected in control group

    Please refer to AZ Press release. At the moment no other data has been published, but in the days to come more details will surface.

    https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/azd1222hlr.html
    thank you
     

    Emios

    Well-known member
  • Dec 10, 2009
    74,238
    66,661
    113
    Mona vaccine awath 2023 wenakan lankawa wage asian countries walata oka enne ne.lankawe minissu 20millon injection hadanna puluwan capacity ekath 50 million.usa unta deela enakota 2023 wenawa
     

    හෙළයෙක්

    Well-known member
  • Apr 26, 2014
    48,741
    98,793
    113
    ඔය 90% හොදයි කියන එක හදල තියෙන්නේ කොහොමද
    100 කට දුන්නොත් දහදෙනෙකුට හැදෙනවා කියන එකද
    90 කට සුවර් එකටම කොච්චර කලත් අවුරුද්දක් ගියත් හැදෙන්නේ නෑ කියන එකද

    ඕකේ data නම් දැක්කේ නෑ කොහෙවත්
    එහෙමම කියන්න බෑ 100000කට දුන්නත් කාටවවත් අවුලක් නැතිව හොද වෙන්නත් පුළුවන්.


     

    imhotep

    Well-known member
  • Mar 29, 2017
    14,829
    8
    35,348
    113
    prime-boost phenomenon :- I think this is same principle that vets using when vaccinating Dogs in first time right?
    It's similar.. Generally a prime-boost immunization strategy can be defined as a regimen of immunization with the same immunogen during the prime and booster doses or a regimen of priming the immune system with an immunogen and then boosting with a different immunogen.

    In this context it refers to an effect when using a vector vaccine. A chimpanzee adenovirus is the vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Pinkbc