Anatha English lorry talk :D

[NATHA SRI JAYASEKARA]

Present

"Present" what?
"Present progressive" or "simple present"
It's a positive question, right?

 

[niranga1989]

Well actually no. What you are saying is
do you suppose we must do ...

Both 'be suppsed to' and 'do noun suppose ...' are suggestions.
But I have never seen 'do noun suppose to' combination.

Well I don't know. Stick with what is natural to you.
For me, the natural way is 'be supposed to'. But sometimes 'do noun suppose ...' comes out of nowhere.

verb + karanan oneda dapu nisa oyata oatalila

natural de mokakda kiala hoyaganna one nam

exact terms dekama google karanna (within quotes) do we supposed to know is never used...but how do we supposed to know is used which is correct...

 

[NATHA SRI JAYASEKARA]

නාථ මෙතන වරද්ද ගත්තෙ ed දාන්න ගිහින්...Hyaenidae හරි

ඔව්, d වැරදියි, එක මම පිලිගන්නවා.

 

[niranga1989]

නාථ මෙතන වරද්ද ගත්තෙ ed දාන්න ගිහින්...Hyaenidae හරි

do we suppose to know? oka hari unata technically... are we supposed to know kiana eke theruma enne naha

do we suppose to know... api denagatha yuthuda
are we supposed to know.. api denagena sitiya yuthuda

 

[HmNRazor]

මමත්වයෙන් ඉගෙන ගන්න පුලුවන් භාෂාවක් නෙමෙයි English කියන්නෙ. පොර දූපත් මානසිකත්වයෙන් ඉන්න උන්ට කවදාවත් හරි English කතා කරන්න වත් ඉගෙනගන්න වත් බෑ. විවෘත මනසින් ඉගෙනගන්න උන්ට විතරයි English හරි ඉගෙන ගන්න පුලුවන්.

 

[Sonique]

Do we suppose to know her වරදිඔ වෙන්නේ කොහොමද? 'Do" Auxiliary verb එකක් විදියට පාවිච්චි කරලා තියෙන්නේ?

Well you can try to find a place where that structure is used. If it is there then you stick to it.

English is not logical sometimes. They made their rules, they break it often and call it a 'common way of using' crap.
Whatever makes you happy.

 

[Hyaenidae]

"Present" what?
"Present progressive" or "simple present"
It's a positive question, right?

That sentence states a universal truth; like,

"To teach English you are supposed to know English".

This is a present tense sentence; how come the past tense of the verb "suppose" is used then? Simple, it's used as an adjective, not a verb. How to use it, you can learn with the article I've linked in the previous page.

 

[niranga1989]

ඔව්, d වැරදියි, එක මම පිලිගන්නවා.

ow eka thama kiwwe... uba kianna uthsaha gatte are we supposed to know kiyana arthaya..
d ayn kala kiala eka enne naha... langin giyata

 

[sam_sajith]

පලයන් යන්න පොන්න වේසිගෙ පුතා ජොබක් නැතුව මේක පැය 24 ම ලැගලා දැන් එනවා පෝර ටෝක් දෙන්න .

අනේ පකෝ , මම පැය 24 බැරිනම් ඕනි වෙලාවක් ඉන්නේ මට ඕනි නිසා , තෝ වගේ සැරින් සැරේ ඇවිත් පුක දීලා රෙවිලා ගූ නාගෙන ගිහින් ආයෙත් හෝදාගෙන එක එකෙක් කියලා හිතුවද ? තොගේ හතර ගැනිසිය මේකේ චොර වෙලා තියන හැටි ගැන කවර කතාද ? මොකද කියන්නේ උඹේ පරණ THREAD එක්කක් අදීමුද

 

[001flyD]

do we suppose to know? oka hari unata technically... are we supposed to know kiana eke theruma enne naha

do we suppose to know... api denagatha yuthuda
are we supposed to know.. api denagena sitiya yuthuda

machan oyage point eka hari mama piligannawa,namuth apata ehema kiyanna ba ehema kiyanawa nam godak ohoma tharka karanna puluwan ewa thiyanawa,ratawal athareth ohoma ewata debates yanawa,kese ho Natha ge sentence eke waraddak thiyanawa d dapuwama eka hari....awulak ganna epa machan math ekka mata hithana de kiwwe

 

[niranga1989]

Ape nane oya loku scene... api weraddak pennuwama piliganne mehmai

---

machan oyage point eka hari mama piligannawa,namuth apata ehema kiyanna ba ehema kiyanawa nam godak ohoma tharka karanna puluwan ewa thiyanawa,ratawal athareth ohoma ewata debates yanawa,kese ho Natha ge sentence eke waraddak thiyanawa d dapuwama eka hari....awulak ganna epa machan math ekka mata hithana de kiwwe

ehema na ban ... mama poddak mada kipena sulu ekek.. ubath tharaha wenna epa
------ Post added on May 19, 2021 at 2:57 PM

 

[NATHA SRI JAYASEKARA]

That sentence states a universal truth; like,

"To teach English you are supposed to know English".

This is a present tense sentence; how come the past tense of the verb "suppose" is used then? Simple, it's used as an adjective, not a verb. How to use it, you can learn with the article I've linked in the previous page.

in the simple present
is this sentence pattern right or wrong?
"Auxiliary verb + Subject +Verb+ Object"
my point is the letter "d" at the end of the suppose is a mistake. But "Do" at the beginning is absolutely correct.

 

[2osama]

අනේ පකෝ , මම පැය 24 බැරිනම් ඕනි වෙලාවක් ඉන්නේ මට ඕනි නිසා , තෝ වගේ සැරින් සැරේ ඇවිත් පුක දීලා රෙවිලා ගූ නාගෙන ගිහින් ආයෙත් හෝදාගෙන එක එකෙක් කියලා හිතුවද ? තොගේ හතර ගැනිසිය මේකේ චොර වෙලා තියන හැටි ගැන කවර කතාද ? මොකද කියන්නේ උඹේ පරණ THREAD එක්කක් අදීමුද

තෝ වගේ හිගන වෙසවෙක් මේකේ වෙන කොහේවත් නැහැ . තෝ කියන්නෙත් මට උබ වගේ පැය 24 ම මේකේ ලගින්න කියලා ද

 

[001flyD]

Ape nane oya loku scene... api weraddak pennuwama piliganne mehmai

View attachment 125787

---

ehema na ban ... mama poddak mada kipena sulu ekek.. ubath tharaha wenna epa
------ Post added on May 19, 2021 at 2:57 PM

hee pissuda machan

 

[niranga1989]

in the simple present
is this sentence pattern right or wrong?
"Auxiliary verb + Subject +Verb+ Object"
my point is the letter d at the end of the suppose is a mistake. But Do at the beginning is absolutely correct.

correct thamay.... kawda na kianne... habai eke enne wena therumak...

 

[sam_sajith]

තෝ වගේ හිගන වෙසවෙක් මේකේ වෙන කොහේවත් නැහැ . තෝ කියන්නෙත් මට උබ වගේ පැය 24 ම මේකේ ලගින්න කියලා ද

පුකේ වෙළදාම කරන අතර තුර අමාරුයි තමා

පරණ thread එකක් ගමුද ආතල් එකට වගේ

 

[EON]

ai ban mun werdddak pennuwama piliganna akamthy.. meka Jeppange upan gathiyakda???

View attachment 125746

mu neda ara uda dagena Megabits walata Megabyte kiyala dagena video kare ?

 

[2osama]

පුකේ වෙළදාම කරන අතර තුර අමාරුයි තමා

පරණ thread එකක් ගමුද ආතල් එකට වගේ

ඔන්ලයින් පුක දෙන එක කලාවක් නම් එකේ පිකාසෝ උබ තමයි

මේකේ එකෙක් ට වත් හැරෙන්න වත් බැහැ

 

[Hyaenidae]

in the simple present
is this sentence pattern right or wrong?
"Auxiliary verb + Subject +Verb+ Object"
my point is the letter d at the end of the suppose is a mistake. But Do at the beginning is absolutely correct.

Is it suppose to or supposed to? As discussed in the section above, when you wish to say you are required or obliged to do something, you want to use supposed to, not suppose to.

I’m not supposed to eat cookies before dinner. (Correct)
I’m not suppose to eat cookies before dinner. (Wrong)

Likewise.

Are you supposed to eat cookies before dinner? (Correct)
Do you suppose to eat cookies before dinner? (Wrong)

Notice how the above sentence matches the "sentence pattern" you mentioned. It's not an issue with "sentence patterns", but recognizing the difference between the usage of the verb "suppose" vs. the adjectival form of it.

 

[NATHA SRI JAYASEKARA]

Is it suppose to or supposed to? As discussed in the section above, when you wish to say you are required or obliged to do something, you want to use supposed to, not suppose to.

I’m not supposed to eat cookies before dinner. (Correct)
I’m not suppose to eat cookies before dinner. (Wrong)

Likewise.

Are you supposed to eat cookies before dinner? (Correct)
Do you suppose to eat cookies before dinner? (Wrong)

Notice how the above sentence matches the "sentence pattern" you mentioned. It's not an issue with "sentence patterns", but recognizing the difference between the usage of the verb "suppose" vs. the adjectival form of it.

No more comments.