EU temporarily withdraws GSP+

dinuwije

Well-known member
  • Oct 18, 2006
    5,284
    648
    113
    42
    Moratuwa
    dude ranil is a genius...i have never found him to do anything wrong so far.....:yes::yes:

    but when did the GSP start to feign....after Sf started to cause trouble.....

    the GSP was stopped coz of war......but that is ok....but ever since SF tried to come to poltics...he has done nothing but give negative rap to our country.....

    we have had SO many elections...including the pervious one before when MR first entered elections....never has a candidate ever behaved in such a way to bash on the lankan system as a whole like SF....:(:(

    Correction GSp started failing even before SF joined politics.....Check out news paper archives & prove me wrong if you can....then I'll accept that it was SF's fault......

    the trend in the country now is to blame everything easily on SF as he has become the scape goat for covering up all the wrongdoings of mahinda & his government...

    it was ppl like rathnasiri who asked hillary clinton to set her house right,denying the swedish Forign minister the visa to enter the country.....pora talks like this all added to the final consequence....this is their way of taking revenge.....
     

    4keven4

    Well-known member
  • May 31, 2007
    7,739
    212
    63
    GMT +1
    Advantages-

    1. One single market with cohesive trade policies
    2. Sri Lanka is the only country in South Asia to be awarded GSP+ status and the scheme is expected to help sustain Sri Lanka ’s garment export market in the EU, in the face of the increasing post quota price competition.
    3. Less risk in regard to exchange rate fluctuations due to the single currency “EURO” of the EU market.
    4. 25 nations with substantial market opportunities and with a common customs tariff.
    5. Tariff reductions granted for both sensitive and non-sensitive items will boost exports.
    6. Potential for further investments in export ventures and growth of the economy.
    7. Opportunities for cost reductions and profit enhancement due to common standards and other requirements of EU market Countries.
    8. Better focus is possible in Export market promotion and penetration.
    9. Even if the country graduates over the threshold in certain sectors, exports can access the EU market and compete under the concessions available under the normal GSP Scheme.
    10. Under the new GSP regime, china has already graduated 80% of its exports while the balance 20% remains under the normal concessions of the GSP. Therefore local exporters should not have a threat from China as Sri Lanka can compete on quality with China .
    11. Though China produces low cost products to the EU market, tariffs are imposed by the EU. Further China is not good at producing quality goods for the EU market. However China has excellent marketing methods for the EU, where as Sri Lanka lacks such approaches.



    Disadvantages-

    1. China may invest in Sri Lanka using the attractive incentives and concessions offered by the BOI, with the objective of accessing the EU markets to capitalize on the concessions available to Sri Lanka because China has already graduated in certain product sectors.
    2. The EU is one of the key players in the World Trade organization (WTO). This is because the EU has a common trade policy, where the European Commission negotiates on behalf of the 25 EU member countries. Therefore the question arises as to whether the developing country friendly policies will be sustained in relation to challenges under the WTO trading scenario.
    3. The strict ‘Rules of Origin’ are a hindrance where the apparel sector is concerned. Under the GSP+ ‘Rules of Origin’, it is possible to use European fabrics or fabric originating from the SAARC region. But the main fabric sources for Sri Lanka are in the ASEAN bloc and not the SAARC or the EU. As a result, a majority of garment exporters may not be able to benefit from the GSP+ concessions.
    4. If Sri Lanka graduates over the threshold in any product the country will have to compete under the Original GSP Scheme, where there will be vigorous market competition.
    5. Under, the new GSP+ of the EU, Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) standards contained in the Food and Feed regulations mean that many developing countries and least developed countries will lack the infrastructure necessary to upgrade their products in order to enter the European agricultural market.
    6. The focus is more on quality than quantity on Imports to the EU.

    http://www.nce.lk/?Action=Question&ID=790
     

    diamonddrago

    Member
    Oct 13, 2009
    4,865
    117
    0
    In the attic...
    Correction GSp started failing even before SF joined politics.....Check out news paper archives & prove me wrong if you can....then I'll accept that it was SF's fault......

    the trend in the country now is to blame everything easily on SF as he has become the scape goat for covering up all the wrongdoings of mahinda & his government...

    it was ppl like rathnasiri who asked hillary clinton to set her house right,denying the swedish Forign minister the visa to enter the country.....pora talks like this all added to the final consequence....this is their way of taking revenge.....

    before SF came to politics its was coz of the war the GSP was reduced...not "bad governance"...thou i can't deny there hasn't been any....:lol:

    a single Swedish journalist isn't gonna do smeck...same with dissing Hillary...seeing how Obama is in charge....and not the Hitler woman...the people in charge do not care abt another's pride.....but the downfall of a country is like some beacon......that is how it works.....

    a general going all out drawing companions between his country and the wastelands of africa will paint that beacon.....:oo: