LIAR ! Do Not Come To SriLanka

[diamonddrago]

සහෝදරයා... ඔයා මුස්ලිම්ද?

yep....proudly muslim + sri lankan....

 

[bishop]

muslims were called all over Medina to gather at a mosque that Muhammad prayed in. They were told to fight against the people of Mecca, who kicked out Muslims from Mecca before. Having little money, the Muslims who originally came from Mecca then attacked and robbed caravans from Mecca. Then in A.D. 624, Muhammad himself led a large group of some three hundred warriors to attack a caravans.

source-wikipedia

 

[diamonddrago]

source-wikipedia

lol.....did you know anyone can edit wikipedia pages....

not the best source when it comes to controversial subjects....

you just have to search justin bebier and twilight to see what i mean....XD

 

[subqi]

***Muslim Book 4, Number 2127: (This is a long hadith where Aisha describes how she covered her head, put on her veil, etc and follows Mohammad outside at night to a graveyard and hurries back before him ...)
“..He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you? ....

Some unscholarly and unsavoury individuals are trying to convince us that the Prophet Muhammad hit his wife Aisha (Aysha).

This is a bizarre claim indeed, especially considering that all the evidence (ie hadith literature) and Islamic scholars show that Muhammad never hit his wives.
Indeed Muhammad taught that the best of you are those who do not hit their wives and Muhammad was the best of them, thus we realise Muhammad indirectly told us he never hit his wives. However it is wise and thorough to analyze the critic's claim further (this is done by my colleague, Gabriel Keresztes AKA Jibreelk):

Did prophet Muhammad ever hit Aisha?

People have been trying to cast shadows of doubt on the character of prophet Muhammad pbuh since the beginning of his prophetic career and they are certainly making their marks today.

Such an incident is when Aisha followed prophet Muhammad one night after being with him, while he did not want to awake her after being instructed by angel Gabriel to go to the grave yard and pray for his companions. What an innocent and pure event, what an amazing characteristic of our beloved prophet, at a time when most of us are in dream land, prayer being the last thing in our dreams, the prophet used to pray. The prophet used to leave his warm bed and go out in the cold or stay for long periods of times (1000 some years before central heating) and pray.

Any way the allegation of the crtics is that prophet Muhammad hit Aysha. We will analyze the allegation (God Willing). Firstly, let us mention it was reported that the prophet never hit any woman or slave, he only hit the enemies of Allah in fights. He never hit a child, he never back bit, he never spoke ill.
The hadith in question goes as such :

Sahih Muslim, Book 004, Number 2127:

Muhammad b. Qais said (to the people): Should I not narrate to you (a hadith of the Holy Prophet) on my authority and on the authority of my mother? We thought that he meant the mother who had given him birth. He (Muhammad b. Qais) then reported that it was ''A''isha who had narrated this: Should I not narrate to you about myself and about the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)? We said: Yes. She said: When it was my turn for Allah''s Messenger (may peace be upon him) to spend the night with me, he turned his side, put on his mantle and took off his shoes and placed them near his feet, and spread the corner of his shawl on his bed and then lay down till he thought that I had gone to sleep. He took hold of his mantle slowly and put on the shoes slowly, and opened the door and went out and then closed it lightly. I covered my head, put on my veil and tightened my waist wrapper, and then went out following his steps till he reached Baqi''. He stood there and he stood for a long time. He then lifted his hands three times, and then returned and I also returned. He hastened his steps and I also hastened my steps. He ran and I too ran. He came (to the house) and I also came (to the house). I, however, preceded him and I entered (the house), and as I lay down in the bed, he (the Holy Prophet) entered the (house), and said: Why is it, O ''A''isha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you? She said: Whatsoever the people conceal, Allah will know it. He said: Gabriel came to me when you saw me. He called me and he concealed it from you. I responded to his call, but I too concealed it from you (for he did not come to you), as you were not fully dressed. I thought that you had gone to sleep, and I did not like to awaken you, fearing that you may be frightened. He (Gabriel) said: Your Lord has commanded you to go to the inhabitants of Baqi'' (to those lying in the graves) and beg pardon for them. I said: Messenger of Allah, how should I pray for them (How should I beg forgiveness for them)? He said: Say, Peace be upon the inhabitants of this city (graveyard) from among the Believers and the Muslims, and may Allah have mercy on those who have gone ahead of us, and those who come later on, and we shall, God willing, join you.

The explanation (by Salman on Sunni forums)
Salamu Alaikum

"Struck" is a bad translation here. The word used is 'lahaza' , which could be translated as "Push" and at most "slap with an open palm" but not a hard, violent slap (and note translating it as "slap" is weaker and less probable). A correct translation would be:

- He pushed me (lahadani) in the chest (fi sadri) with a push (lahdatan)which made me sore (awja'atni).

It is very interesting to note that "pushing" of the Prophet does indeed convey meaning - usually to drive away evil influence and thought.

- Amir ibn Raba and Sahl ibn Hunayf went out to bathe. Amir took off his woolen robe. He [Sahl] narrates: "I looked at him and I cast the evil eye on him. He went down into the water then I heard a noise coming from him. I called out to him three times but there was no answer. I went to call the Messenger of Allah who came on foot and waded his way in the water. Then he slapped/pushed his chest with his hand, saying: "O Allah! drive away from him its heat and its coolness and its harm." Then he rose up and said: "If one of you sees something that pleases him in his brother - whether in his person or property - let him invoke blessing for him, for the evil eye is a reality."

(Tafsir ibn Kathir)

Similarly, in a narration it states:

- Ubbay said: There occurred in my mind a sort of denial which did not occur even during the Days of Ignorance. When the Messenger of Allah saw how I was affected, he slapped/pushed me on the chest. I broke into a sweat and felt as if I were looking at Allah in fear.

(Sahih Muslim)

Wallahu A'lam

JibreelK comments:

There is another incident when a man of Quraish was trying to kill the prophet while he was making tawaf around the kaba. He kept getting closer and closer to him, and the prophet was receiving revelation of his intentions. The prophet kept asking him about his intention while this person was denying it but persisted in his goal and would try again. When he got really close to him, the prophet hit him on his chest and all the doubts and disbelief left his heart and he became a believer.

The above examples and poofs go to show that the prophet did not hit Aysha as abuse or as wife beating as the Orientalists claim, he pushed her as to remove any ill doubts or suspicion out of her heart of HIM NOT BEING FAIR TO HER (which is proven by the question he asks her in the hadith). He did the same to some companions and to many others he would put his hand on their heart, and pray for them, push their chest, and other proximity methods in order to remove the doubts or ill thoughts from their heart.

Only ill minded people and people who go to distort the image of our prophets character can see that as abuse, while they themselves are the worst of abusers, seeking to find any kind of ambiguity in Islam so they can attack it and never ever to withdraw their claims even when proven wrong such as now. Instead of admitting that they were wrong, they move on to someone else who they can confuse with the same shady argument.

 

[diamonddrago]

source-wikipedia

Badr: The First Battle in Islam
The Quraish had begun grand-scale preparations to attack Medina. The trade caravan which had gone to Syria that year headed by Abu Sufyan was extraordinarily equipped. Every Quraishite put all his savings in that caravan, and it was decided that whatever the profit accrued that year, it would not be given to the traders but would be spent on arms, horses, and other items of war to fight the Muslims of Medina.

This news did cause much anxiety in Medina. As Abu Sufyan was returning from Syria, he feared that the Muslims might intercept his trade caravan. He sent a messenger well in advance to inform the leaders of the Quraish of his fears. Upon receiving the message, a well-equipped army of one thousand Meccans marched towards Medina under the command of Abu Jahl.

They had reached Badr (200 miles from Mecca and 80 miles from Medina) when news came that the trade caravan was passing just three miles on the seaside from the Quraishites' camp, and that it had not encountered any attack from the Muslims yet. But since the Meccans were so eager on giving battle to Muhammad (s.a.w.a.) and his followers, they decided to proceed towards Medina anyway. After all, was not the objective of sending such a trade caravan this very battle?! So, why should they go back to Mecca when they had one thousand well-equipped warriors among them who were sufficient to teach the Muslims a lesson? They camped at the stream of Badr.

Now let us see what was happening in Medina. When news came that the trade caravan was coming from Syria (on the north side) and that the Meccan army was marching towards Medina (from the South), the Muslims thought that they would be crushed between these two enemy groups.

Now, there were two alternatives before the Muslims in Medina: to either save themselves from being overwhelmed by the Meccans with all their resources from the rich Syrian trade, or make another option (one which had the least danger for the time being and which also promised a rich booty): fall upon the Quraishi caravan returning from Syria richly laden and led by Abu Sufyan with only 40 not so well-armed men. From a worldly point of view, this latter course was the safest and the most lucrative, and many Muslims preferred it. The other alternative, which was actually adopted on the recommendation of the Prophet as guided by God, was to leave the booty alone and to march out boldly against the well-armed and well-equipped Quraishite army of 1,000 men coming from Mecca.

This situation is described in the following ayats of the Qur'an:

Just as your Lord caused you (O Prophet!) to go forth from your house with the truth, though a party of the believers were averse, they disputed with you about the truth after it had become clear, (and they went forth) as if they were being driven to death while they looked (at it). And when Allah promised you one of the two parties that it shall be yours, and you loved that the one not armed should be yours, and Allah desired to manifest the truth of what was true by His words and to cut off the root of the unbelievers. That He may manifest the truth of what was true and show the falsehood of what was false, even though the guilty ones disliked it. (Qur'an, 8:5-8)

These verses clearly show that the Meccan army was already on its way long before the Muslims came out of Medina to defend themselves. Also, they clearly show that although some Muslims desired to avoid the Meccan army and to attack the trade caravan, that idea was not accepted, and that the decided aim and objective of their march was to fight the Meccan army which was already on its way.

This clearly belies the vicious and mischievous propaganda of Western writers who claim that the Prophet had intended to attack the trade caravan of the Quraish and that the Quraish had come out only to protect their caravan. The verses of the Qur'an are the only contemporary record of the events of Badr. If there is any writing by anyone, which goes against this authentic narrative, it must be thrown out of window.

You may wonder why the enemies of Islam labor so much to present this battle of Badr as one in which the Quraishites (poor souls!) were aiming just to protect their trade caravan. The reason is this: It was the first battle between the Quraishites and the Muslims, and if the responsibility of this first battle is laid on the heads of the Muslims, then all subsequent battles could be portrayed as being the continuation of this battle and, thus, the Holy Prophet could be presented as a warrior prophet who by his plundering designs compelled the "peace-loving" Meccans to fight!

Anyhow, let us go back to our narrative. The Meccan army was in control of the stream of Badr, and the ground of their campsite was of firm clay. Contrarily, the Muslims were far from the stream and thus experienced difficulty in finding water. To make the matters worse, many Muslims had nocturnal discharge while asleep and became "unclean" (najis). And the ground under them was sandy which was likely to prevent fast running during the battle.

God helped them by sending rain which provided them with water enough for their needs and made the sandy ground firm for them, while the firm clay of the Meccans' side became muddy, making their stand and maneuvers difficult.

______________________________________________________________________

This is what really happened......

can read more at....

http://www.al-islam.org/lifeprophet/14.htm

the battle of badr is well documented....i don't think even the wiki page about is edited much...go see....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Badr

 

[Banned]

ඇයි....මෙච්චර..... මේ දොස්තරට බුද්ධාගම ගැන මෙච්චර කැක්කුමක්.......පොතේ නමයි, පිටුවේ අංකෙයි, කීවෙනි ඡෙදයේ, එ වාකයයේ තියෙන අකුරු ගානයි...කට පාඩමින් කිව්වම, ඉතින්.... අර අහන් ඉන්න ටික, මේ දොස්තරගේ දැනුම, ඇත්ත වෙන්නැති කියන්නේ.... කියලා ඇඳ ගන්නවා. මොකො එතන ඉන්න අය ඔය පොත් කියවලා තියෙන එකක් යැයි.....

දේශනේ ඉවර උනාම, අපි තමයි.....මේ ලොකේ ඉන්න උතුම්ම කොට්ටාශේ කියලා හිතාගෙන, ගිහින් TV එකේ ප්‍රවෘත්තිත් බලලා. අද කියක්.... බොම්බ හින්දා... දිවිය ලොකේ ගිහිල්ලද කියලා බලලා. ආයිත් හෙට, ගිහින් දොස්තරගේ දේශනේ අහලා...... හිත හදා ගන්නවා.

තමන්ගේ ආගම අදහන් එවුන් වැරදි පාරේ යන එක ගැන දේශන තියන්නේ නැතිව...... අනිත් ආගම් වල වැරදි හොයනවා පුස්තකාල පෙරල ගෙන.

හැබැයි... මට එකකට සතුටුයි...... දොස්තරට, මිනිහගේ ආගම ගැන නැති කැක්කුමක් බුද්ධාගම ගැන ඇති එකට.....

මේ ලොකේ එහෙයියො.....නැති කරන්න බැ..... උන් ඉන්නකන්..... ඔය වගේ දොස්තරලා මාට්ටු වෙන්නෙත් නැ.

 

[bishop]

In the month of September of 622 AD, Mohammad migrated from Mecca to Medina. He was not able to bring any money with him. His first wife, Khadiza, died in 619 AD, while he was in Mecca. What was the profession of Mohammad and his companions after the migration to Medina? Did Allah send them food through overnight delivery? Did Mohammad use a credit card? He did not even have a house where he could acquire a home equity loan.
So, how did they survive?

Throughout the year of 623 AD, Mohammad and his companions made several attempts to rob Meccan caravans and kidnap innocent people. Muslims proudly claims these attacks as 'military expeditions', which, of course, are nothing but mugging. Those attacks are of two categories, 'Ghazawaat' (plural of Ghazawah), and 'Saraayaa' (plural of Sariya). When Mohammad took part in the action, it was called 'Ghazawah' and raids without Muhammad's presence are known as 'Sariya'. Islamic scholars vary on the number of these attacks, but it is estimated to be approximately 17 to 27 'Ghazawaat' and 36 to 100 'Saraayaa'.
Muhammad hit the jackpot in 'the awful caravan robbery', commonly known as Ghazawaat Al-Badr. According to 'Sirat Rasul Allah 428' and 'Tabari VII:29', "Then the apostle heard that Abu Sufyan b. Harb was coming from Syria with a large caravan of Quraysh, containing their money and merchandise, accompanied by some thirty or forty men." Mohammad said, "This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property, Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as prey,"
The Battle of Badr was an offensive war from Mohammad's side. He knew that his poor and needy Muhajiruns (those who migrated from Mecca) would be happy to loot for wealth but he was doubtful about Ansars (Muslims of Medina who invited Mohammad). "So the apostle was afraid that the Ansar would not feel obligated to help him unless he was attacked by an enemy in Medina, and that they would not feel it incumbent upon them to go with him against an enemy outside their territory. (Ishaq 435). Eventually, they agreed and Mohammad was happy to have a group of skilled warriors on his side. They all proceeded towards Badr, hoping to change their fortune.
Meanwhile, "When Abu Sufyan got near the Hijaz, he was seeking news, and questioning every rider in his anxiety, until he got news from some riders that Muhammad had called out his companions against him and his caravan. He took alarm at that and hired Damdam b. Amr al-Ghifari and sent him to Mecca , ordering him to call out Quraysh in defense of their property". (Ishaq 428).
Ibn Ishaq continues, "Abu Sufyan went forward to get in front of the caravan as a precautionary measure until he came down to the water, and asked Majdi if he had noticed anything. He replied that he had seen nothing untoward: merely two riders had stopped on the hill and taken water away in a skin. Abu Sufyan came to the spot where they had halted, picked up some camel dung and broke it in pieces and found that it contained date-stones. 'By God,' he said, 'this is fodder of Yathrib.' He returned at once to his companions and changed the caravan's direction from the road to the seashore leaving Badr on the left, traveling as quickly as possible" (Ishaq 437).
Does it look like Mohammad was playing a defensive game? Often, Muslims complain that their dearest Mohammad, 'the propane of Islam', had to fight because he was attacked. Poor Abu Sufyan was desperately trying to save the caravan and called for help. Indeed, help arrived in due course. Ibn Ishaq elaborates, "When Abu Sufayn saw that he had saved his caravan he sent word to Quraysh. 'Since you came out to save your caravan, your men, and your property and God has delivered them, go back.' Abu Jahl said, 'By God, we will not go back until we have been to Badr'. Badr was the site for one of the Arab fairs where they used to hold a market every year. 'We will spend three days there, slaughter camels and feast and drink wine, and the girls shall play for us. The Arabs will hear that we have come and gathered together, and will respect us in the future. So come on!' (Ishaq: 438).

 

[diamonddrago]

In the month of September of 622 AD, Mohammad migrated from Mecca to Medina. He was not able to bring any money with him. His first wife, Khadiza, died in 619 AD, while he was in Mecca. What was the profession of Mohammad and his companions after the migration to Medina? Did Allah send them food through overnight delivery? Did Mohammad use a credit card? He did not even have a house where he could acquire a home equity loan. So, how did they survive?
Throughout the year of 623 AD, Mohammad and his companions made several attempts to rob Meccan caravans and kidnap innocent people. Muslims proudly claims these attacks as 'military expeditions', which, of course, are nothing but mugging. Those attacks are of two categories, 'Ghazawaat' (plural of Ghazawah), and 'Saraayaa' (plural of Sariya). When Mohammad took part in the action, it was called 'Ghazawah' and raids without Muhammad's presence are known as 'Sariya'. Islamic scholars vary on the number of these attacks, but it is estimated to be approximately 17 to 27 'Ghazawaat' and 36 to 100 'Saraayaa'.
Muhammad hit the jackpot in 'the awful caravan robbery', commonly known as Ghazawaat Al-Badr. According to 'Sirat Rasul Allah 428' and 'Tabari VII:29', "Then the apostle heard that Abu Sufyan b. Harb was coming from Syria with a large caravan of Quraysh, containing their money and merchandise, accompanied by some thirty or forty men." Mohammad said, "This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property, Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as prey,"
The Battle of Badr was an offensive war from Mohammad's side. He knew that his poor and needy Muhajiruns (those who migrated from Mecca) would be happy to loot for wealth but he was doubtful about Ansars (Muslims of Medina who invited Mohammad). "So the apostle was afraid that the Ansar would not feel obligated to help him unless he was attacked by an enemy in Medina, and that they would not feel it incumbent upon them to go with him against an enemy outside their territory. (Ishaq 435). Eventually, they agreed and Mohammad was happy to have a group of skilled warriors on his side. They all proceeded towards Badr, hoping to change their fortune.
Meanwhile, "When Abu Sufyan got near the Hijaz, he was seeking news, and questioning every rider in his anxiety, until he got news from some riders that Muhammad had called out his companions against him and his caravan. He took alarm at that and hired Damdam b. Amr al-Ghifari and sent him to Mecca , ordering him to call out Quraysh in defense of their property". (Ishaq 428).
Ibn Ishaq continues, "Abu Sufyan went forward to get in front of the caravan as a precautionary measure until he came down to the water, and asked Majdi if he had noticed anything. He replied that he had seen nothing untoward: merely two riders had stopped on the hill and taken water away in a skin. Abu Sufyan came to the spot where they had halted, picked up some camel dung and broke it in pieces and found that it contained date-stones. 'By God,' he said, 'this is fodder of Yathrib.' He returned at once to his companions and changed the caravan's direction from the road to the seashore leaving Badr on the left, traveling as quickly as possible" (Ishaq 437).
Does it look like Mohammad was playing a defensive game? Often, Muslims complain that their dearest Mohammad, 'the propane of Islam', had to fight because he was attacked. Poor Abu Sufyan was desperately trying to save the caravan and called for help. Indeed, help arrived in due course. Ibn Ishaq elaborates, "When Abu Sufayn saw that he had saved his caravan he sent word to Quraysh. 'Since you came out to save your caravan, your men, and your property and God has delivered them, go back.' Abu Jahl said, 'By God, we will not go back until we have been to Badr'. Badr was the site for one of the Arab fairs where they used to hold a market every year. 'We will spend three days there, slaughter camels and feast and drink wine, and the girls shall play for us. The Arabs will hear that we have come and gathered together, and will respect us in the future. So come on!' (Ishaq: 438).

lol this is quite obviously a tainted version.....

can't argue with stupid n blind hate....

give me the important point in this...if you can....

and what is this Ishaq....there is no Surah nor valid Hadith under that name.....

 

[mj_shiyaz]

lol....he had 11 wives...yet he had concubines.....

Muhammad(pbuh) had 11 wives.....except for Ayesha....most of them were widows...orphans or slaves.....who's lives he raised....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad%27s_wives

now please tell me where you got the "proof" for the rest.....

Muhammad(pbuh) had never beat his wives.....all his wives had said he is very tender and attentive towards them.....

AM REALLY PROUD TO BE A PART OF WORLD FASTEST SPREADING RELIGION... CHECKOUT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yoi0mU4hTB4
FORMER BAD BOY LOON

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKXKKyyXG4g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYcJPyHITM4
NAPOLIAN FROM OUTLAWS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4Z3iciJa7w

 

[Malcolm X]

yep....proudly muslim + sri lankan....

ඇයි ඉතිං ඔච්චර හිනාවෙලාම ඕක කියන්නේ..?

 

[bishop]

lol this is quite obviously a tainted version.....

can't argue with stupid n blind hate....

give me the important point in this...if you can....

and what is this Ishaq....there is no Surah nor valid Hadith under that name.....

• He robbed the caravans!

 

[Banned]

 

[mj_shiyaz]

IF BUDDISM IS DAMN CORRECT. SO WHY YOU GUYZ GET PANIC OF DR ZAKIR NAIK'S ARRIVAL... SO IT PROOF THAT THE BUDDISM IS NOT PERFECT & YET TO BE DEVELOPED.... HE..HE..HE....

 

[diamonddrago]

• He robbed the caravans!

no not according to the records of the battle of badr....

caravans don't travel about with that many fully armed guards....it costs money to do that....

and trade caravans traveled constantly...Arabs are basically traders....

so what kind of coincidence does it take...for a Quraishy caravan...which is that well armed....to be targeted...randomly..by the prophet...when so many far more juicy and easy pickings are available....

 

[diamonddrago]

lol..sounds like any buddhist EK member...who says things like this about Akon's video...and the pic of that girl kissing the Buddha statue....

i don't think i have to post them here for ppl to remember....

 

[bishop]

In The Life of Muhammad, which is a translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (translated by Guillaume, 21st impression, 2007), we can easily find the truth about the incidents involved in what Muslims call the battle of Badr (p. 289 and after).



“…when the apostle heard about Abu Sufyan coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as a prey.’” (p. 289)
The above is the reason that started the events leading to what happened at Badr.
Does this look like going to battle, or going to do some highway robbery?
What is the difference between what Muhammad was trying to do, and what the Somali pirates try to do?

 

[diamonddrago]

In The Life of Muhammad, which is a translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah (translated by Guillaume, 21st impression, 2007), we can easily find the truth about the incidents involved in what Muslims call the battle of Badr (p. 289 and after).



“…when the apostle heard about Abu Sufyan coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps God will give it as a prey.’” (p. 289)
The above is the reason that started the events leading to what happened at Badr.
Does this look like going to battle, or going to do some highway robbery?
What is the difference between what Muhammad was trying to do, and what the Somali pirates try to do?

so basically an invalid hadith....the only real and accurate hadiths are by Muslim or Sufi or the kind.....the rest is not verified....

might as well be anyone making things up.....just coz you got a webpage...what you post isn't necessarily true....

wikipedia....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophetic_biography



The original text of the Sīrat Rasūl Allāh by Muhammed Ibn Ishaq (Medina, 85 A.H. – Bagdad, 151 A.H.) is unavailable. However, much of it was copied over into a work of his own by Ibn Hisham (Basra – Fustat, circa 218 A.H.). Ibn Hisham also "abbreviated, annotated, and sometimes altered" the text of Ibn Ishaq, according to Guillaume (at xvii). Interpolations made by Ibn Hisham are said to be recognizable and can be deleted, leaving as a remainder an "edited" version of Ibn Ishaq's original text (otherwise lost). Guillaume (at xxxi) points out that Ibn Hisham's version omits several narratives given by al-Tabari in his History (e.g., at 1192, and at 1341), for which al-Tabari cited Ibn Ishaq as his source. In the "edited" text we have, an introductory part describes pre-Islamic Arabia (about 100 pages in Guillaume), before commencing with the narratives surrounding the life of Muhammad. Ibn Ishaq's Sīrat Rasūl Allāh is the earliest sizable biography of the Prophet.
Gustav Weil, Das Leben Mohammeds nach Mohammed ibn Ishak, bearbeitet von Abd Malik ibn Hischam (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler'schen Buchh. 1864), 2 volumes. The Sirah Rasul Allah translated into German with annotations.

Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad. Apostle of Allah (London: The Folio Society 1964), 177 pages. From a translation by Edward Rehatsek (Hungary 1819 – Mumbai [Bombay] 1891), which has been abridged and introduced [at 5–13] by Michael Edwards. Rehatsek had completed his translation; it was given to the Royal Asiatic Society of London by F. F. Arbuthnot in 1898.

Alfred Guillaume, The Life of Muhammad. A translation of Ishaq's "Sirat Rasul Allah", with introduction [xiii-xliii] and notes (Oxford University 1955), xlvii + 815 pages. The Arabic text used by Guillaume was the Cairo edition of 1355/1937 by Mustafa al-Saqqa, Ibrahim al-Abyari and Abdul-Hafiz Shalabi, as well as another, that of F. Wustenfeld (Göttingen 1858–1860). Ibn Hasham's "Notes" are given at pages 691–798.



so basically a hadith Christians have kept...and edited as they will.....well the somali pirates didn't have made up stories about them....

when WELL documented versions of the happenings is in the battle of badr documentary....

how can we trust an edited version of the truth...when multiple sources provide well documented version saying the same thing about the same incident?

which is the caravan was attacked as it was carrying supplies for a freaking war/genocide by the Quraishy....

 

[Malcolm X]

IF BUDDISM IS DAMN CORRECT. SO WHY YOU GUYZ GET PANIC OF DR ZAKIR NAIK'S ARRIVAL... SO IT PROOF THAT THE BUDDISM IS NOT PERFECT & YET TO BE DEVELOPED.... HE..HE..HE....

 

[bishop]

so basically an invalid hadith....the only real and accurate hadiths are by Muslim or Sufi or the kind.....the rest is not verified....

might as well be anyone making things up.....just coz you got a webpage...what you post isn't necessarily true....

Ha! Ha! is That Bullshit Kuran true?

 

[diamonddrago]

Ha! Ha! is That Bullshit Kuran true?

hadith is not the Quran....

and how is the Quran "bullshit".....

i have given more information now...please read that post again....before you reply....