අළුත්ම Intel Processor එක

gudaya

Well-known member
  • Jan 9, 2009
    14,378
    1,489
    113
    ළිඳේ ♥♥♥♥
    macho...sandy neme brandy ,i7 dammat wadak na hard disk eka rotate wenne 7200i...kochara processing power tibat wadak na oka hadana kan...

    okata solution eka vidiyata use karanne ram eka ne...40GB vitara ram ekak tibba nam itin godama taama..hard ekak ona na..(oken tamai hard eka slow nisa hard ekata read /write karama pramanaya adu karanne)
    wd velocy raptor seagate cheetah,hithachi ultra star wage ekak hari ssd ekak use karala balapan speed da nadda kiyala
     

    rcharindu

    Active member
  • Jan 8, 2008
    824
    93
    28
    මෙක ඉතින් කරන්න පුලුවන් දෙයක් ද??
    දෙයියනේ කියලා ගෙම් ගහන්න ටිබ්බ හොදම දෙවල් දාලා pc එකක් ගත්තා විතරයි...
    දැන් ඉතින් තව ටික දවසකින් එකත් පොලවෙ ගහන්න තමා වෙන්නේ..:P:P

    Rep+
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jolly_Roger

    sanzilla jackcat

    Well-known member
  • Oct 3, 2008
    6,759
    3,344
    113
    ෆ්ලුජා නගරය
    macho eke podi aththak thiyanwa eth dan 15000 RPM Hard Drive thiyanwa.anika machan RAM eke mathakaya thawakalikai.eka nisa aniwa HDD ekak ona. poddak hoyala balapan macho... :):):):):):):)


    machan youn can't use the RAM as a hard disk.There is something like this is
    true.

    There is a paging mechanism that is used in the x86 and x64 computers.
    So some part of the memory will be paged when they are not used recently
    by the operating system automatically. we say this page file in windows and
    swapping in linux world.This is to increase the performance.It's a good thing.

    And that doesn't imply that you don't need High Speed hard disks as the
    same speed or likely equally to the RAM speeds. Currently there are hard
    disks on the markert which met that requirments. These hard disks are
    called SSD disks , Solid State Drives.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid-state_drive

    In SSD disks there are no moving parts, instead of moving electrons :P
    or moving parts due to the terminal expansion.

    But the technology is too costy still now.
    I asked a 3 months ago 40GB costs around 35,000/- Rs , so can you
    spend 35,000/- for just 40GB ? hell nooooooooo !

    technology is there if you have the money,the problem is the money.

    and integrating the CPU and GPU is a good thing. But intel cards are less
    features, they are not experts in graphics chips. Even the ATI cards are
    better than that intel chips.I think intel have to integrate with Nvdia ,in the
    AMD fusion technology AMD is working closely with the ATI ,actually ATI is
    owned by AMD now.

    Typically when we talk about the graphics world , according to the book of
    GPU gems book 1 , the performance does not really depend on the CPU
    and GPU communication barriars. There are very small data to communicated
    or shared. like vertices ,display lists and textures... very small when comparing the speed of the modern computer bus. Actually most of performance factors depends on the last rendering stage , last stages of the graphics pipeline.so I don't think this be a better idea.

    But intel uses the 32nm or 45nm technologies which are really cheap and
    cost effective.Nvdia chip technologies can't afford that 32nm technology due to their techinical constrains , so there will be low heat generation because they are 32nm transistors!

    And when there are no intermediate chips for interfacing to the busses it will be again cheaper too. However if the GPU unit burns on a chip then whole the CPU have to be thrown away.